AI Tool Compare

Alternative to

6 Alternatives to Jellyfish in 2026

Engineering leaders look past Jellyfish when quote-only pricing blocks a trial budget, when a finance-oriented package is more than a team needs, or when the vendor's pages leave security and data questions unanswered. Common destinations are Swarmia, LinearB and Axify.

Why people look for an alternative to Jellyfish

No prices are published

Jellyfish's pricing page directs visitors to request a quote and says cost depends on seats and the modules selected. A manager cannot cost a pilot or compare plans before a sales call.

The packaging reaches into finance

Plans are named AI Impact, Developer Productivity and DevFinOps, the last covering R&D tax credits and software capitalization. Teams wanting delivery metrics only may be buying for an audience in finance.

Security and data terms are not documented

The security page returned an error when read for this comparison, and the pricing page names only SOC 1 Type II for DevFinOps. Training on customer data, hosting region and retention are not stated.

The best Jellyfish alternatives

  1. 1
    Swarmia Oy, FinlandFree plan$45 per developer per month billed annually for Standard

    Swarmia is a Finnish platform with a free tier for the smallest teams and add-on modules, among them AI adoption and cost tracking. An MCP connector lets Claude or Cursor query engineering data, and the footer names SOC 2 Type 2.

    Switch if you want to price the tool from a web page, buy modules one by one, and ask your assistant about delivery data

  2. 2
    Not stated on the vendor pages, Not stated on the vendor pagesFree trial$29 per user per month billed annually for Essentials

    LinearB goes beyond dashboards. gitStream routes risky pull requests to code owners and merges low-risk ones automatically, while AI review runs on each pull request. It states SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001. A 45-day trial with no card lets a team test it on live repositories.

    Switch if you want workflow automation and code review next to metrics, and your repositories are on GitHub Cloud

  3. 3
    Nexapp Technologies Inc. (privacy policy); site footer reads Axify Technologies inc., CanadaFree trial$29 USD per contributor per month billed annually for Pro

    Axify is a Canadian product whose Pro tier bundles AI adoption, AI cost projection, DORA and value stream metrics. The privacy policy states servers in Canada, and the MCP connector stores no prompts. A 14-day trial needs no credit card, and Enterprise is quote-only.

    Switch if you need a stated server location outside the US and want AI cost projection in the base tier

  4. 4
    Hatica, Inc., Not stated on the vendor pagesFree plan$19 per member per month for Pro

    Hatica has a free plan with unlimited members and data sources plus developer experience surveys. Paid tiers add DORA, velocity, wellbeing dashboards and SSO, and Enterprise can be self-hosted or run in a private cloud.

    Switch if you are a smaller team on a tight budget who values wellbeing signals and may later need a private deployment

  5. 5
    Waydev Inc., Not stated on the vendor pagesFree trial

    Waydev says its Brain assistant runs a 15B model without sending inference to outside model APIs. Premium lists AI adoption, impact and ROI, and git folders are copied for analysis, deleted in real time and stats purged on disconnect.

    Switch if you care most about keeping code analysis off external AI providers and want AI ROI reporting

  6. 6
    Not stated on the vendor pages, Not stated on the vendor pagesPaid only$25-$55 per contributor per month

    Plandek offers over 500 configurable metrics with unlimited dashboards and repositories, plus API access for outside data sources. A free AI Impact Report benchmarks adoption and spend against thousands of teams. Retention on its pages is capped at 180 days, so long-range trend work needs an export.

    Switch if you want deep metric customization and an outside benchmark of AI spend before buying anything

Before you switch away from Jellyfish

Write down which Jellyfish views leadership uses weekly, such as resource allocation or DevFinOps reports, because rivals often cover delivery metrics well and finance reporting thinly. Export allocation rules and team structures, and check how each tool maps your repositories, boards and incident data. Confirm SSO, role access and audit options at the plan you would buy. Run two sprints in parallel, compare cycle time and review time figures against what Jellyfish reports, and ask each vendor in writing about training on your code metadata and retention.

The full ranking of this category is in Best AI Engineering Analytics Software in 2026.

Frequently asked questions

Does Jellyfish publish pricing?

No. The pricing page asks for a quote, based on seats and modules. Swarmia, LinearB, Axify, Hatica and Plandek print per-user or per-member prices, which helps a team build a budget case before any sales conversation, though some show annual figures only.

Which alternative suits finance and capitalization reporting?

Jellyfish's DevFinOps package is its distinctive part, covering software capitalization and R&D tax credits. None of the alternatives listed here advertises the same on the pages read, so a finance-led buyer should test whether Waydev, Plandek or Swarmia reports meet an auditor's needs.

Is there a free alternative to Jellyfish?

Swarmia has a free tier for up to nine developers, and Hatica has a free plan with unlimited members and one month of history. Plandek offers a free one-off AI Impact Report. Axify and LinearB offer trials, with 14 days and 45 days respectively.

Which alternative keeps AI analysis off third-party models?

Waydev states that its assistant runs without sending inference to external model APIs. Axify names servers in Canada, and Hatica offers a self-hosted or private cloud tier. Verify each claim in the vendor's current security documents before committing, as pages change.