AI Tool Compare

Alternative to

6 Alternatives to Postman in 2026

Teams move away from Postman when a per-user Team plan at $19 starts to add up, when metered AI credits and Context Graph limits worry them, or when they want collections stored as plain files in Git. The common destinations are Apidog, Insomnia, Bruno and Requestly.

Why people look for an alternative to Postman

Seat cost and plan ladder

Postman Team costs $19 monthly per user on annual billing, and Solo, at $9, serves a single user. Shared workspaces mean paying per seat, and governance belongs to Enterprise, which is quote only.

AI is metered in credits

Solo includes 400 AI credits monthly, Team gives 400 for each user, and Enterprise pools 800. Which plans include Agent Mode is not stated on Postman's pricing page, so budgeting AI use is difficult.

Cloud workspaces versus files

Postman keeps collections in workspaces and offers Native Git, but Free recovers deleted collections for one day and Team for 90. Developers who want everything as files in the repository look at tools built around that.

The best Postman alternatives

  1. 1

    Apidog

    Apidog, Not stated on the vendor's pagesFree plan$9 per user per month

    Apidog covers API design, debugging, mocks and test scenarios in a single product, and paid plans begin at $9 monthly per user. Its docs describe AI-generated cases for each endpoint, grouped as positive, negative, boundary and security sets. Apidog Europe keeps data in AWS Ireland.

    Switch if you want tests, design and mocks inside one product, with a European data region available.

  2. 2

    Insomnia

    Kong Inc., United StatesFree plan$12 per user per month for Pro

    Insomnia comes from Kong. Pro costs $12 monthly per user, and the free Essentials tier includes Git Sync for up to three users. Its AI works with Claude, OpenAI, Gemini or a local model, and mock servers can be generated from a plain-English description.

    Switch if you want to choose your own AI model, including a local one, and keep a Git-friendly client.

  3. 3

    Bruno

    Bruno Software, Inc., United StatesFree plan$6 per user per month for Pro

    Bruno keeps collections as plain files inside your repository. Open Source costs $0, and billed annually Pro is $6 and Ultimate $11 per user monthly. Which plan includes its AI Assistant is not shown on the pricing page.

    Switch if you Switch if lowest cost and collections in Git matter more to you than AI help.

  4. 4

    Requestly

    BrowserStack, Inc., United StatesFree trial$10 per user per month for Team

    Requestly is owned by BrowserStack. It is a Git-native client with a CLI, and its AI Test Case Generator writes tests from a prompt. Team Pro adds unlimited AI credits. Instead of a free tier, the pricing page shows a 30-day trial.

    Switch if you want local projects synced to GitHub or GitLab and prompt-written tests.

  5. 5
    Testfully Pty Ltd, Not stated on the vendor pagesFree plan$14 per user per month for Team Edition

    Testfully has a free Developer Edition, and annual paid tiers cost $14 or $29 monthly per user. Postman data comes in through Easy Switch, and monitors alert Slack and PagerDuty. No AI feature was named on the pages opened.

    Switch if you want a plain client with imports from Postman, monitoring and no focus on AI.

  6. 6
    Katalon, Inc., United StatesFree planFree Studio; from $84 per seat per month

    Katalon is a broader quality platform in which API tests live next to web and mobile flows. Professional costs $1,800 yearly per seat and brings AI agents, self-healing and an MCP server, all absent from Free.

    Switch if you Switch if your QA group covers APIs plus web and mobile and wants AI authoring for all of them.

Before you switch away from Postman

Export your Postman collections, environments and globals first, and check which of them hold secrets before they leave. Note how many monitors, mock servers and Flows you run, since Postman's limits for those (10,000 monitoring requests on Solo and Team) do not carry over, and the new tool may price them differently. Look at your CI scripts, because the Postman CLI commands will need replacement. Run one collection in the candidate and compare the results. Postman states that your data does not train its models and lists AWS hosting in the EU and the U.S., so ask the next vendor for the same in writing.

The full ranking of this category is in Best AI API Testing Tools in 2026.

Frequently asked questions

Does Postman train AI models on my API data?

Postman's security page says your data does not train its models, with no further detail, and that data and backups sit on AWS servers in the EU and the U.S. Of the alternatives, Insomnia's AI relies in part on third-party providers, while Bruno's and Requestly's vendor policies were not checked for this.

Can I import Postman collections into an alternative?

Testfully advertises Easy Switch for Postman and Insomnia imports, and Requestly positions itself for teams leaving Postman. Import support for the other tools was not checked for this page, so test an export with your largest collection and confirm that scripts, variables and environments survive before you move a team.

Which Postman alternative is cheapest for a small team?

Bruno's Open Source edition costs $0 and Pro is $6 per user monthly on annual billing. Next come Apidog from $9, Requestly Team at $10 and Insomnia Pro at $12, against $19 for Postman Team. Several free tiers cover only one or two people, so check the limits.

What does Postman have that alternatives lack?

Postman lists an API Catalog, Private API Network, governance, audit logs and a Postman MCP Server on its higher plans, plus a Passport credential proxy for agents. Most alternatives are narrower clients. Enterprise-scale governance is the main reason larger teams stay, while smaller teams often need only the client and tests.