Software advice
Best AI Warehouse Management Software in 2026
AI warehouse management software is a system that controls receiving, putaway, picking, packing and shipping in a warehouse, and adds machine learning or software agents to slot stock, plan labor and direct robots or conveyors. It is not a general ERP or a transportation system, and its AI claims need testing against your own order data.
Quick answer
Fishbowl ranks first because it posts a full price ladder from $229 per month. Logiwa suits teams wanting an agent-ready, API-first cloud WMS, and Infios or Manhattan fit large automated networks that accept a sales-led project.
A buyer of warehouse management software chooses between small-business inventory systems, mid-market cloud platforms and enterprise suites. Small systems start at a posted monthly price. Mid-market vendors add order management, billing and integrations. Enterprise vendors run robots, conveyors and several buildings, and sell through projects. This ranking judges how clearly each vendor describes what its AI does, whether prices are public, what the pages say about data, and what an operation must run before the system pays off. Facts come from vendor pages read on 30 October 2026. Any AI claim should be tested on a sample of your own orders.
The 12 best AI warehouse management systems in 2026, ranked
There is no score. Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. How we rank.
| # | Tool | Best for | Free plan | Entry price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fishbowl | Small distributors and makers that outgrew spreadsheets and run QuickBooks as their ledger | No | $229 per month, billed annually |
| 2 | Logiwa | Ecommerce brands, 3PLs and distributors wanting a cloud WMS built around agents and open APIs | No | Quoted |
| 3 | Deposco | Brands, wholesalers and 3PLs that want warehouse, order management and demand planning in one vendor | No | Quoted |
| 4 | Extensiv | Third-party logistics providers who bill clients per activity and onboard many small brands | No | Quoted |
| 5 | Made4net | Mid-size and large operations with conveyors or robots that want WMS, labor, yard and routing from one maker | No | Quoted |
| 6 | Softeon | Healthcare, food, retail and 3PL operations wanting WMS, execution control and order management on one platform | No | Quoted |
| 7 | Infios Warehouse Management | Large distribution networks that need WMS with robots, voice, labor and yard control under one vendor | No | Quoted |
| 8 | Manhattan Active Warehouse | Retailers and 3PLs with large multi-site networks, heavy automation and an enterprise IT budget | No | Quoted |
| 9 | SAP Extended Warehouse Management | SAP S/4HANA customers that want warehouse execution inside the same ERP landscape | No | Quoted |
| 10 | Oracle Warehouse Management Cloud | Oracle Fusion customers with retail, wholesale, manufacturing or 3PL flows that need a cloud WMS | No | Quoted |
| 11 | ShipHero | Ecommerce brands and 3PLs shipping parcel volume from Shopify and marketplace orders | No | Quoted |
| 12 | Tecsys | Enterprise distributors and health systems that want a configurable cloud WMS with guided picking. | No | Quoted |
- 1
Fishbowl
Fishbowl takes first place because it is the only vendor in this ranking that prints a full price ladder, from $229 to $729 per month plus two quoted editions. Its AI is an assistant named Athena for questions about your own inventory data, not slotting or robot control. That limits it to modest warehouses, which is exactly where the posted pricing helps a buyer decide quickly.
Strong on
- Five editions with monthly prices and user counts are published on the pricing page
- Two-way QuickBooks sync appears in the Growth plan and above
- Lot and forward or backward traceability is included from the Scale plan
Weak on
- Demand forecasting is a paid add-on on Growth and only included from Scale
- No labor planning, slotting engine or robotics orchestration is described on the pages read
Skip it if: Multi-building operators running conveyors, sorters or goods-to-person robots across several sites. Essentials includes 2 users and QuickBooks or Xero sync; warehouse and manufacturing editions start higher, priced by users.
- 2
Logiwa
Logiwa ranks second because Logiwa IO is the clearest case here of a WMS pitched as AI-native, with an architecture meant to let software agents route work and plan labor through exposed data endpoints. The site gives no model detail and no price, so the claim rests on a demo. Its headless design suits teams with developers who want to build on the warehouse core.
Strong on
- Described as API-first and headless, with an app store for third-party add-ons
- Pre-integrated carrier shipping and sales-channel connectors for ecommerce flows
- Names B2C, DTC, 3PL and wholesale in its customer groups
Weak on
- The AI graphic carries no technical detail on models, inputs or what agents may change
- No pricing page content and no self-serve trial were visible
Skip it if: Buyers who need published pricing, a free trial or a named list of security certifications before a call. No price is posted; the site offers a demo request only, and it criticizes headcount-based licensing from older vendors.
- 3
Deposco
Deposco sits third because its Bright Warehouse WMS comes with order management, shipping, demand planning and an intelligence layer for labor, inventory and shipping, all from one vendor. The AI claims are broad headlines rather than documented functions. Buyers weighing it against Manhattan will find the site makes that comparison itself, which is useful for shortlisting.
Strong on
- Intelligence modules named for operations, shipping, inventory, labor and executive reporting
- More than 150 integrations listed, including Shopify, NetSuite, Amazon Seller Central and UPS
- Connects to pick-to-light, sortation and fulfillment robotics according to its WMS page
Weak on
- Productivity gains of 30 to 50 percent are the vendor's own claim, with no method stated
- No price list, so budgeting needs a sales conversation
Skip it if: Single-site operators wanting a flat monthly plan they can start without talking to sales. Quoted after a demo; the pricing URL tried on the site returned a not-found page on 30 October 2026.
- 4
Extensiv
Extensiv ranks fourth because its 3PL Warehouse Manager is built for one buyer, the 3PL, and says so. Billing automation, dock scheduling and small parcel shipping matter more to that buyer than robotics. AI shows up as a product line and services menu, with little published on what it does, so the case rests on 3PL workflow depth rather than machine learning.
Strong on
- Billing Manager automates client invoicing from warehouse transactions
- Integration Manager, formerly CartRover, connects online order channels, with a free start offered
- Site cites more than 1,500 3PLs as customers on the product page
Weak on
- An AI product entry exists in the menu but the pages read describe no specific AI function
- Aimed at 3PL operators, so a brand running its own warehouse gets features it will not use
Skip it if: Manufacturers and retailers running a private distribution center with no outside clients to bill. Not published; the pricing URL tried returned a not-found page, and every call to action is a demo request.
- 5
Made4net
Made4net comes fifth because WarehouseExpert is sold with labor, yard, routing and last-mile modules from one vendor, and the site claims about 800 WMS customers in 30 countries. AI is discussed in a blog post, not as a named product feature. Buyers get a configurable rules-based system and a stated average go-live of 20 weeks, which is a real planning figure.
Strong on
- WMS, labor standards, yard, route optimization and proof of delivery sold as one connected suite
- Manages material handling equipment, automation and robotics from the WMS core
- Average go-live of 20 weeks is stated on the site
Weak on
- AI appears in blog content rather than as documented slotting or labor features
- Twenty weeks and a rules-based configuration imply a real implementation project
Skip it if: Small shops looking for a quick self-serve start with posted monthly prices. No prices appear on the pages read; the site offers a demo and an ROI calculator instead.
- 6
Softeon
Softeon takes sixth place because it covers WMS, a warehouse execution layer for automation, labor, yard and distributed order management on one platform, and its header now reads IFS Softeon. The AI page linked from the menu returned a not-found error when tested, so the AI-powered headline could not be backed with specifics. It lands mid-table on breadth with unproven AI.
Strong on
- Warehouse execution system listed for coordinating automation, robotics and kitting alongside the WMS
- Distributed order management shares the same platform as the warehouse modules
- Named by Gartner as a Visionary in the 2026 WMS Magic Quadrant, as the site reports
Weak on
- The Artificial Intelligence page in the site menu was a dead link on 30 October 2026
- Branding is mid-transition to IFS Softeon, and deployment and pricing are not stated
Skip it if: Buyers who need concrete AI functions documented before they shortlist a vendor. No pricing or deployment details were found on the pages read; contact is by form.
- 7
Infios Warehouse Management
Infios ranks seventh because the product formerly sold as Körber Supply Chain Software has the most detailed AI wording of the large vendors, combining predictive, generative, agentic and conversational AI, with autonomy that grows from approved suggestions to guarded automation. It is a larger, project-style purchase with a recent rename, which lowers its place for mid-size buyers.
Strong on
- Describes a step from AI recommendations a person approves up to automated execution inside set limits
- Lists autonomous mobile robots, warehouse control, voice and yard modules next to the WMS
- States more than 1,600 WMS customers on its homepage
Weak on
- Figures like 70 percent backorder reduction are the vendor's own and tied to unnamed cases
- The Körber to Infios rename means older documents and partners still use the earlier name
Skip it if: Small teams without an integrator, since the suite spans orders, warehouse and transportation. Quoted by sales; no price list appears on the Infios site pages that were read.
- 8
Manhattan Active Warehouse
Manhattan Active Warehouse ranks eighth because it is built for the largest networks, with customer stories from DHL, Staples and BESTSELLER, and an agent design where AI shares the live WMS data model rather than an export. Editions and quarterly releases help, but no pricing is public and the scale fits few buyers, so it sits behind the more approachable options.
Strong on
- Versionless cloud design with quarterly updates and no upgrade projects, as the site describes it
- Agents run on the same data model and audit logs as the warehouse itself
- Customer stories cover robotic shuttle systems and multi-site rollouts
Weak on
- Three editions exist but their prices and differences were not stated on the pages read
- Agent capabilities are described in general terms, not as a function list
Skip it if: Single-warehouse businesses that want a WMS live within weeks on a modest budget. Offered in Essentials, Enterprise and Enterprise Premier editions; no prices are published.
- 9
SAP Extended Warehouse Management
SAP Extended Warehouse Management lands ninth because its pull is the SAP landscape, not AI. The product page names intelligent slotting rules, direct control of automation equipment and links to quality, production and track-and-trace, in the cloud. Nothing on the page describes agents or machine learning, so for AI-led buying it trails the vendors above it.
Strong on
- Slotting rules and space utilization are named on the product page
- Direct control of warehouse automation equipment is listed
- Fits an existing SAP landscape with quality and production processes
Weak on
- No AI feature beyond slotting rules is described on the product page read
- Value depends on already running SAP, and implementation usually involves SAP partners
Skip it if: Companies on non-SAP ERPs that want a self-contained, fast-start warehouse system. Sold through SAP and partners; the product page offers a demo and a product tour, with no pricing.
- 10
Oracle Warehouse Management Cloud
Oracle Warehouse Management Cloud closes the list because its warehouse page is strong on process coverage, from omnichannel and returns to value-added services and equipment links, but names no AI in the WMS itself. The AI wording on the page belongs to the transportation product. Oracle says it has been a Gartner Leader for 11 years, which supports maturity, not AI.
Strong on
- Connects to pick-to-light, carton sorters, carousels and conveyors through warehouse control systems
- Covers B2B and B2C fulfillment, put-to-store, cross docking and reverse logistics
- Page reports an 11th consecutive year as a Leader in the 2026 Gartner WMS Magic Quadrant
Weak on
- AI claims on the page relate to transportation routing, not warehouse tasks
- No prices and a heavier fit if the rest of the company does not run Oracle
Skip it if: Teams that want AI slotting or labor planning documented in the product pages before a demo. Sold by quote; the product page offers demos and a logistics brief, not prices.
- 11
ShipHero
ShipHero ranks eleventh because it is a parcel-first warehouse system built around ecommerce and 3PL billing, not a heavy enterprise suite. It lists rate shopping, a 3PL client portal, labor dashboards and an AI picking feature. Pricing is quote-only, and the site quotes an average go-live of 6 to 8 weeks, which is a vendor claim.
Strong on
- 3PL client portal and work orders are listed alongside unlimited clients
- Site lists more than 70 integrations, including Shopify, NetSuite and major carriers
- Security page states a SOC 2 Type 2 audit and GDPR compliance
Weak on
- No prices are published, every plan starts with a quote request
- Built for parcel ecommerce, with less emphasis on pallet or manufacturing flows
Skip it if: Manufacturers, cold storage operators and pallet-heavy distributors needing deep slotting, yard or labor engineering. The site routes every plan through a quote request, so no monthly figure is published.
- 12
Tecsys sits twelfth because the public material is the thinnest in this list. Its warehouse page describes Visual Logistics instructions, adaptive scaling and workflows that non-technical staff can change, and it mentions AI-driven intelligence in the Elite platform text. It publishes no price, no named integrations and no hosting region, so a buyer cannot compare it with the eleven vendors above without a sales call.
Strong on
- Visual Logistics gives workers clear on-screen instructions at each step of a task.
- Workflows are configurable by non-technical users as operations change over time.
- A trust center describes annual SOC 2 Type 2 audits and PCI DSS compliance.
Weak on
- No price, plan or trial is published, so every evaluation starts with a sales conversation.
- The warehouse page names no ERP or third-party connections, and no API documentation was found.
Skip it if: Small operations that need a visible price, a free trial or a documented API before they talk to sales. Quote only through a sales conversation; the warehouse page shows no price, tiers or trial.
How these AI warehouse management systems were judged
Which vendors document what their warehouse AI actually does?
Documentation of AI functions varies widely. Infios describes predictive, generative, agentic and conversational AI with an approval path, and Manhattan explains that its agents read the live WMS data model. Deposco lists intelligence modules for labor, shipping and inventory. Logiwa calls itself AI-native but shows no model detail. Softeon's AI page returned an error when tested, and SAP and Oracle describe slotting and equipment control more than machine learning. No vendor page read here publishes an independent accuracy figure for slotting or labor forecasts, so a pilot on your own orders is the only real test of quality.
What does warehouse management software cost and who posts a price?
Only Fishbowl posts prices in this ranking: $229, $429 and $729 per month billed annually for three editions, with warehouse and manufacturing editions from $595 and $675. Every other vendor sells by quote. Quotes usually depend on users, sites, transactions and modules, and implementation services come on top. Ask each vendor for a three-year total that includes integration work, scanners, training and support. The Logiwa site criticizes headcount licensing, which tells you to ask how each vendor counts users. An enterprise quote for a suite and a posted monthly plan are not the same product, so compare scope before price.
How is warehouse and order data handled?
Warehouse systems hold order histories, customer addresses and inventory positions, and AI features read that data. None of the pages read for this ranking set out whether customer data trains vendor models. Logiwa points to a Trust Center and names no certification, and the other vendors' data policies were not checked for this. Before signing, ask where data is hosted, whether it is used to train shared models, how long it is kept after contract end, and which certifications cover the cloud environment. Agent architectures such as Logiwa's and Manhattan's deserve extra questions about which actions an agent can take without human approval.
How hard is it to leave a warehouse management system?
Leaving a WMS means moving item masters, locations, open orders and integrations while the building keeps shipping. Rules-based systems such as Made4net's hold years of configuration, and enterprise suites tie warehouse logic to labor, yard and robot control, so a switch can take as long as the original rollout. Open APIs, as Logiwa and Fishbowl describe, ease data export but not process rework. Versionless cloud designs, as Manhattan describes, remove upgrade projects but not contract terms. Ask for the export format of your data, the contract term, notice period and what happens to custom rules on exit.
Which warehouse management software fits which operation?
Fit follows the size and shape of the operation. A distributor with one site and QuickBooks fits Fishbowl. A 3PL billing clients per activity fits Extensiv or Deposco. A brand building on its own APIs fits Logiwa. A network with shuttles and mobile robots fits Infios, Made4net or Manhattan, and a company already on SAP or Oracle should price SAP EWM or Oracle first. The wrong fit shows up in implementation time and in features paid for but never used. Write down order lines per day, sites, automation and ERP before the first demo.
How to choose an AI warehouse management system in three steps
- Measure your orders, sites and automation first. Write down daily order lines, peak-season multiples, number of buildings, SKU count and any conveyors, sorters or robots. These numbers split the market quickly. Under a few hundred orders a day at one site, a posted-price system such as Fishbowl may be enough. Several buildings with automation point to the enterprise group and a project budget. Include your ERP and ecommerce platform, because integration with them decides cost more than features do. Share the same sheet with every vendor so quotes cover the same scope, and you can compare them line by line afterward.
- Test AI claims on a sample of your own orders. Ask each shortlisted vendor to show slotting, wave planning or labor forecasts using a month of your anonymized order lines. Compare the suggestions with what your supervisors would do and note where the system is wrong. Ask which actions an agent can take on its own, and which need approval. A vendor with a real function will run your data in a demo or pilot. A vendor with a headline will return to slides. Keep the output, since it also shows how much configuration the AI needs before it behaves.
- Price three years including services and hardware. Request a three-year cost that lists license, users or transactions, implementation services, integration work, scanners and printers, training and support. Ask whether a price rises with users, sites or order volume. Check go-live estimates against references of your size, such as the 20 weeks Made4net states. Ask for two customers with a similar profile and speak to them about delays, overages and support response. The cheapest quote often leaves out services that arrive on the invoice later, so insist on a like-for-like table.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best AI warehouse management software in 2026?
Fishbowl ranks first in this editorial list because it publishes a full price ladder starting at $229 per month and keeps its AI claims modest. Logiwa follows for teams wanting an API-first, agent-ready cloud system. Larger automated networks should look at Infios, Made4net and Manhattan. The right pick depends on order volume, sites and automation, not on one winner.
Does warehouse management software really use AI?
Some do and some use the word loosely. Infios and Manhattan describe agents and machine learning built into execution, and Deposco lists intelligence modules for labor and inventory. SAP and Oracle pages emphasize slotting rules and equipment control. None of the pages read here gave an accuracy figure, so ask for a demo using your own order data.
How much does a warehouse management system cost?
Published prices exist only at the small end. Fishbowl lists $229, $429 and $729 per month billed annually, with warehouse and manufacturing editions from $595 and $675. Mid-market and enterprise vendors quote by users, sites and modules, and implementation is extra. Ask for a three-year total including integration, hardware and training before comparing offers.
Which warehouse management software suits a 3PL?
Extensiv builds its 3PL Warehouse Manager around billing, dock scheduling and client portals, and Deposco offers a 3PL client portal and 3PL-specific workflows. Made4net and Softeon also sell 3PL modules. A 3PL should test how each system bills clients per activity and how easily a new client's integration is switched on.
Can a small business use an AI warehouse management system?
Yes, though small businesses are served by few vendors on this list. Fishbowl starts at $229 per month with two users and sells through a demo. Other vendors here are sales-led and sized for larger operations. A small business should be wary of paying for robotics orchestration or labor modules that it will not use for years.
How long does a WMS implementation take?
It depends on scope. Made4net states an average go-live of 20 weeks, and Infios cites 16 weeks or fewer for its order management product. A small system such as Fishbowl is lighter, while multi-site automation projects run longer. Ask vendors for reference customers of your size and for the milestone plan, not just a go-live date.
Should I choose SAP or Oracle warehouse software if I use their ERP?
Price them first, since they fit existing master data and processes, and SAP EWM lists direct control of automation equipment. Compare them with a specialist WMS anyway. The AI content on their warehouse product pages is thinner than at Infios, Manhattan or Logiwa, so ask for demonstrations of slotting and labor features.
Is my order data used to train the vendor's AI?
The vendor pages read for this ranking did not state it, and the data policies were not checked for this page. Ask each vendor in writing whether customer data trains shared models, where it is hosted, how long it is kept after contract end and which certifications apply. Put the answers into the contract rather than relying on marketing pages.