Software advice
Best AI SOAR Platforms in 2026
An AI SOAR platform is security orchestration, automation and response software that takes alerts from SIEM, EDR and cloud tools, enriches them, runs playbooks to contain threats and uses language models or agents to triage, investigate or draft the response. It differs from a SIEM, which detects and stores events, and from a managed detection service, where the vendor's analysts do the work. Security operations centers use it to cut repetitive triage.
Quick answer
D3 Security ranks first because it states its pricing structure, alert tiers, SOC 2 Type II and deployment regions. Tines fits teams that want a free edition and their own model. Guardsix fits buyers who need on-premises or air-gapped response under European jurisdiction.
A SOC lead who evaluates SOAR today hears two stories: classic playbook automation, and agents that triage alerts alone. Both promise less manual work, but the vendor pages say little about what an alert, an action or an agent run costs, where investigation data is processed and whether a model can be swapped for your own. Prices are almost always behind a demo, so buyers compare on slogans. This ranking therefore weighs what a buyer can verify before talking to sales: the pricing model, stated certifications, hosting and deployment choices, the shape of the AI features, integration breadth and the vendor's home jurisdiction.
The 10 best AI SOAR platforms in 2026, ranked
There is no score. Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. How we rank.
| # | Tool | Best for | Free plan | Entry price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | D3 Security | SOCs with high alert volume that want AI cost included in a fixed fee | No | Quoted |
| 2 | Tines | Teams that want to automate security and IT work from a free start | Yes | Free edition; paid editions on request |
| 3 | Torq | SOC teams that want agentic triage with audit logs and certifications on record | No | Quoted |
| 4 | Sekoia | European teams that want SIEM, threat intelligence and response agents from one vendor | No | Quoted |
| 5 | Guardsix | European organizations that need on-premises or air-gapped response | No | Quoted |
| 6 | Swimlane | Large SOCs and MSSPs that want multi-tenant automation with model choice | No | Quoted |
| 7 | FortiSOAR | Fortinet customers that want SOAR with prebuilt agents and OT coverage | No | Quoted |
| 8 | Cortex XSOAR | Large SOCs and MSSPs with Palo Alto Networks tooling already in place | No | Quoted |
| 9 | Rapid7 InsightConnect | Rapid7 customers that want no-code workflows across IT and security | No | Quoted |
| 10 | IBM QRadar SOAR | Enterprises that need privacy breach response tied to incident playbooks | No | Quoted |
- 1
D3 Security takes first place because its pricing structure is spelled out: tiers by daily alert volume, named user licenses, a flat overage rate and no token charges. It states SOC 2 Type II, Azure regions including Ireland, and on-premises or air-gapped options. The dollar figures are still quote-only, and the privacy policy is dated 2022, so check current terms.
Strong on
- No token or inference charges, even when you bring your own LLM
- Autonomy modes per use case, from deterministic to autonomous
- 800-plus integrations claimed, with Azure regions in Ireland, US, Canada and Japan
Weak on
- Tier prices, user rate and overage rate are not printed
- Privacy policy names no hosting location and is dated April 2022
Skip it if: Small teams that want a self-serve free edition and a published monthly price. Annual subscription by daily alert tier from 500 to 10,000, plus user licenses; per-alert rate above the tier.
- 2
Tines ranks second because its free edition has printed limits and paid editions include unlimited workflows, connectors and the option to bring your own model. It positions itself as a governed environment for agents, with an AI gateway for IT. No certification or hosting region appears on the pages read, and paid prices are not shown.
Strong on
- Free edition with unlimited users, spaces and connectors and a one-time $50 AI allowance
- Choice of LLM provider, with the option to switch
- Cloud and self-hosted options, per the privacy policy
Weak on
- Paid prices are shown only after a demo
- No certification or hosting region appears on the pages we read
Skip it if: Buyers that need a stated certification list and hosting region before a first call. Free covers unlimited users and connectors with 3 live workflows; paid editions need a demo.
- 3
Torq ranks third because its security page lists SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA alignment, GDPR terms and BSI C5:2020, which few rivals match. The product page describes triage, investigation, response and hunting agents with manual override and audit logs. Pricing, hosting regions and model-training terms are not stated on the pages read, so those need asking.
Strong on
- SOC 2 Type II with audit reports available on request, plus BSI C5:2020
- Agents record evidence, timelines and recommended actions with manual override
- Response can run autonomously or with human-on-the-loop oversight
Weak on
- No hosting regions are named; the page says GCP and AWS
- No statement on whether customer data trains AI models
Skip it if: Buyers who need a published price or a self-hosted deployment. No price on the product page; the vendor directs visitors to a demo.
- 4
Sekoia ranks fourth. Its trust center lists ISO 27001:2022, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type 1, GDPR, NIS2 and DORA, with a subprocessor list and AI transparency document available. Its agents can isolate hosts or disable credentials automatically or after one-click approval, and a self-hosted edition is live. Pricing is not stated, and response is part of a wider platform.
Strong on
- Trust center lists ISO 27001:2022, PCI DSS, SOC 2 Type 1 and a subprocessors list
- Containment actions run automatically or after one-click approval by an analyst
- A self-hosted edition is now offered alongside the cloud service
Weak on
- Automation sits inside a broader SIEM platform, not a standalone SOAR
- SOC 2 is Type 1 and no price is published
Skip it if: Teams that only want a standalone orchestration tool for a third-party SIEM. No price is stated on the product page; sold through demos.
- 5
Guardsix ranks fifth. Its SOAR page states self-hosted deployment that can be fully air-gapped, with playbooks running on your own infrastructure and an audit trail mapped to NIS2 Article 21 and DORA. The company, formerly Logpoint, is Danish. The page mentions no AI features, no certification and no price, so it ranks below vendors that state more.
Strong on
- Playbooks run locally and the environment can be fully air-gapped
- Audit trail mapped to NIS2 Article 21, DORA and the CAF
- Danish company with a Copenhagen address in its privacy policy
Weak on
- No AI features are described on the SOAR page
- No certification or price appears on the pages we read
Skip it if: Teams that want AI agents for triage or a cloud-native service. Pricing not described on the SOAR page; the vendor links to a pricing predictability page.
- 6
Swimlane ranks sixth. Its Turbine platform adds Hero AI prompts, an agent builder and per-agent model choice, including bring your own model, and routes each alert to automation or an agent. A privacy policy names AWS US-East-1 for operational data. The pages read list no certifications and no prices, and its efficiency figures are the vendor's own claims.
Strong on
- Choose the model for each agent or bring your own model
- Multi-tenant features aimed at managed security service providers
- Alerts are routed to deterministic, assisted or agentic handling
Weak on
- Efficiency claims such as 75 percent faster resolution are the vendor's own
- No certification list or price appears on the pages we read
Skip it if: Teams that need a published price or a ready certification list. No price on the site; visitors are directed to request a demo.
- 7
FortiSOAR ranks seventh. The page lists over 20 prebuilt agents, support for your own LLM, guardrails and step logging, and over 700 API connections, available as SaaS or self-managed. FortiAI is stated to be powered by OpenAI. No price or product certification is stated, and Fortinet data centers are primarily in Canada per its privacy policy.
Strong on
- Over 20 prebuilt agents with guardrails and logging of each step
- Available as SaaS or as self-managed software, per the vendor page
- Supports MCP, plus your own or a third-party LLM
Weak on
- Default agents use FortiAI, powered by OpenAI per the vendor FAQ
- No price or product certification appears on the page we read
Skip it if: Teams that do not want an OpenAI-backed default model for agents. No price on the product page; the vendor points to an ordering guide and a sales form.
- 8
Cortex XSOAR ranks eighth. The page cites more than 900 prebuilt integration and automation packs, a virtual war room and a multitenant option for managed service providers. Its AI mention is limited to machine learning that aids analysts, and neither pricing, deployment options nor certifications are stated on the page, which limits what a buyer can verify.
Strong on
- More than 900 prebuilt integration and automation packs cited
- Multitenant platform built for managed service providers, per the page
- Incident data, threat intelligence and collaboration in one war room
Weak on
- The page describes only machine learning to aid analysts, no agents
- No price, deployment model or certification is stated
Skip it if: Teams looking for agentic triage or a published price list. No price on the page; it offers an ROI calculator and a demo form.
- 9
Rapid7 InsightConnect ranks ninth. The documentation describes a no-code workflow builder, human decision steps and more than 300 plugins, with an orchestrator for on-premises systems. The SOAR page mentions no AI, no price and no deployment detail, though Rapid7 links separate AI-driven detection products, which makes this a plain workflow tool on the page read.
Strong on
- Over 300 plugins with prebuilt actions and triggers
- Human decision steps pause a workflow for input
- Workflow visibility shows each step to help locate errors
Weak on
- The SOAR page describes no AI features at all
- No price, hosting detail or certification appears on pages we read
Skip it if: Buyers who want agent-based triage built into the SOAR tool. No price on the product page; request a demo or contact sales.
- 10
IBM QRadar SOAR ranks last. The page describes a Playbook Designer, case management and privacy breach reporting, citing 180 or more regulations in one place and over 200 in another. It mentions no AI, no deployment model, no integration count and no certification, which leaves the least for a buyer to verify before a sales call.
Strong on
- Privacy breach reporting tasks can be built into incident playbooks
- Playbook Designer adds threat enrichment at each stage
- Open integration framework supported by IBM and security partners
Weak on
- The page mentions no AI features and gives inconsistent regulation counts
- No price, deployment model or certification is stated
Skip it if: Teams that need agentic AI or a published price list. No price listed; IBM says pricing includes subscription tiers, deployment options and feature bundles.
How these AI SOAR platforms were judged
How much can AI actually handle in a SOAR platform?
The honest answer depends on the vendor's own autonomy controls, because accuracy claims on product pages are the vendor's, not an outside test. D3 Security describes four autonomy modes per use case, from deterministic to autonomous, and grades findings as Confirmed, Inferred or Gap. Torq lists AI verdicts that learn from analyst decisions with audit logs and manual override. Swimlane routes each alert to deterministic automation, assisted investigation or a fully agentic one. Cortex XSOAR's page mentions only machine learning that aids analysts, and IBM's page mentions no AI. Test every vendor on a week of your own closed alerts and compare verdicts with your analysts.
What does an AI SOAR platform cost?
As of November 2026, no vendor here prints a full price list. D3 Security states an annual subscription set by a daily alert tier from 500 to 10,000 alerts, named user licenses and a flat per-alert rate above the tier, with no token charges. Tines publishes a free edition with three live workflows and a one-time $50 AI allowance, while paid editions need a demo. Torq, Swimlane, Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, Rapid7 and IBM direct buyers to sales. Ask how an alert, an action or an agent run is counted, and whether AI usage is metered separately.
Where does a SOAR platform process your incident data?
Incident data contains hostnames, user names and sometimes customer information, so location matters. D3 Security lists Azure regions including Ireland, plus Canada, the US and Japan, and on-premises, hybrid and air-gapped options with AI inference inside your boundary. Guardsix states fully air-gapped, self-hosted deployment. Swimlane's privacy policy places operational data in AWS US-East-1 and notes that Hero AI data may go through AWS Bedrock. Torq names GCP and AWS without regions, and Tines mentions cloud or self-hosted options without naming regions. Ask each vendor for written terms on model training.
How hard is it to move playbooks to another SOAR?
Playbooks are the lock-in. Each vendor stores logic in its own format, so a move means rebuilding workflows, and connectors and cases follow the vendor's data model. D3 Security promotes an XSOAR Exit Program and a legacy SOAR migration program, which shows the market now treats migration as a buying reason. Tines and Swimlane let teams build workflows without code, which shortens a rebuild, while Guardsix keeps playbooks local on your own infrastructure. Before signing, ask for an export of playbooks and case data in a documented format, and for the notice period and the term of the contract.
Which SOAR platform fits your SOC size?
Match the platform to alert volume and staff. A small team that wants to automate a handful of tasks and try before it buys fits Tines. A SOC with thousands of alerts a day that wants agents under governance fits D3 Security, Torq or Swimlane. A European organization that needs sovereignty over the whole chain fits Guardsix or Sekoia. A company already standardized on Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet, Rapid7 or IBM gets native integrations from XSOAR, FortiSOAR, InsightConnect or QRadar SOAR, and can weigh those savings against a more closed stack.
How to choose an AI SOAR platform in three steps
- Replay a week of closed alerts through each shortlisted tool. Pull one week of alerts your analysts already closed, with their verdicts, and run the same set through each trial or proof of concept. Count correct closures, wrong closures and cases that required a human. Note how the vendor explains its decision, because D3 Security and Torq both promise audit trails for AI steps. A tool that is right 95 percent of the time but cannot show why will still lose your analysts' trust. Do this before any price discussion, since price only matters for a tool that works.
- Pin down the billing unit before you compare quotes. Ask each vendor what is counted: alerts, actions, workflows, cases, agent runs or tokens. D3 Security counts alerts per day and charges a flat rate above the tier. Tines separates a free edition from paid editions with unlimited workflows. Others did not print a unit on the pages we read. Request a quote for your alert volume, then ask what a doubling of volume would cost and who pays for model usage. If a vendor passes through model costs, ask for a monthly cap in the contract.
- Test the integrations you actually run. Vendor counts such as 900 packs at Cortex XSOAR, 700 connections at FortiSOAR or over 300 plugins at Rapid7 mean little if your EDR, ticketing and identity tools are missing. List your ten most used systems and ask for a live demo of each connector doing a real action, such as isolating a host or disabling an account. Check who maintains the connector when the third-party API changes, since D3 Security says its connectors adapt and Guardsix says it maintains integrations. Confirm the answer in writing.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best AI SOAR platform in 2026?
D3 Security ranks first here because it states its pricing structure, alert tiers from 500 to 10,000 a day, SOC 2 Type II and deployment regions. Tines suits buyers who want a free edition and bring-your-own-model options, and Guardsix suits on-premises European buyers. The right pick still depends on alert volume and the tools you run.
What is the difference between SOAR and SIEM?
A SIEM collects logs and detects threats, while a SOAR platform takes the resulting alerts and runs enrichment, ticketing and containment. Some vendors sell both, such as Sekoia and Guardsix, and others integrate with whichever SIEM you run. Splitting them lets a team replace one without rebuilding the other.
Is an AI SOC platform the same as SOAR?
Not exactly. Classic SOAR runs playbooks that humans write. AI SOC platforms add agents that triage and investigate alerts and may decide the next step. Many vendors now sell both together, for example Torq, Swimlane and D3 Security. Ask which steps run deterministically, which use AI, and where a human approves.
Can I try a SOAR platform for free?
Tines publishes a free edition with unlimited users, spaces and connectors, three live workflows and a one-time $50 AI allowance. The other vendors in this ranking direct buyers to demos or sales. Rapid7 and others offer proofs of concept on request, so ask for a trial on your own alert data.
Which SOAR vendors are European?
Guardsix is a Danish company with an address in Copenhagen, formerly known as Logpoint. Sekoia is French. Tines has a European headquarters in Dublin alongside a Boston office. D3 Security is Canadian, and the rest are American. Home country does not fix data location, so ask each vendor where incident data is processed.
Do SOAR platforms train AI models on customer data?
The pages we opened rarely say. Tines states in its privacy policy that it does not use personal data to train public or third-party foundation models. D3 Security says AI inference can stay inside your boundary in on-premises deployments. Torq, Swimlane and the others did not state a training position, so ask in writing.
How long does it take to deploy a SOAR platform?
It varies with integrations more than with software. A cloud workflow tool can run a first playbook within days, but a SOC that wants dozens of tested playbooks needs weeks. D3 Security says its confidence scoring tunes over the first 60 to 90 days, which is a useful planning figure for agentic tools.
Can a SOAR platform replace analysts?
Not fully. Vendors describe human-on-the-loop designs, approvals for destructive actions and audit logs of every agent step. Torq mentions autonomous or human-on-the-loop response, and Sekoia offers one-click analyst approval. Plan for analysts to review exceptions and tune playbooks, with automation absorbing repetitive triage rather than removing the team.