Software advice
Best AI Supply Chain Planning Software in 2026
AI supply chain planning software is a set of cloud tools that join demand forecasts, inventory targets, supply and production plans and sales and operations planning in one connected model, then use machine learning and optimization to propose or change those plans. It is not an ERP, a warehouse system or a single-product forecasting add-on, although it reads data from all three.
Quick answer
Kinaxis ranks first because its trust center lists SOC 2 Type II, BSI C5 and ISO 27001:2022 audits. ToolsGroup suits buyers who want a stated choice of data region, Slimstock fits mid-market firms that prefer a European vendor, and Lokad is the plainest on security.
A planning director shopping for AI in this category is rarely buying a forecast alone. The real question is who adjusts the plan when a supplier slips, and whether a planner can see why a number changed. Almost every vendor here sells through a demo, so prices are not a basis for comparison. What can be compared is what each page states about certifications, hosting, how agents act, and how much a planner stays in control. We read vendor pages in November 2026 and ran none of these products, so every accuracy or savings figure belongs to its vendor. The order below favors claims a buyer can check before signing.
The 11 best AI supply chain planning software in 2026, ranked
There is no score. Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. How we rank.
| # | Tool | Best for | Free plan | Entry price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kinaxis | Global manufacturers that need audit reports and hosting regions stated before a security review | No | Quoted |
| 2 | ToolsGroup | Retailers and distributors with long item lists that want a data region chosen per customer | No | Quoted |
| 3 | o9 Solutions | Large groups that want one knowledge graph linking sales, supply, finance and revenue planning | No | Quoted |
| 4 | Slimstock | Dutch and European distributors that want a local vendor with ISO 27001:2022 and ERP-side planning | No | Quoted |
| 5 | Lokad | Firms with unusual constraints that accept a scientist-led project in a custom language | No | Quoted |
| 6 | GAINS | Distributors and service-parts businesses that want approved agent actions across many SKUs | No | Quoted |
| 7 | John Galt Solutions | Mid-sized companies consolidating several ERPs and planning tools behind one platform | No | Quoted |
| 8 | Oracle Fusion Cloud SCM Planning | Companies already running Oracle Fusion applications that want planning in the same suite | No | Quoted |
| 9 | EazyStock | Small and mid-sized wholesalers who want reorder points and supplier orders on top of an ERP | No | Quoted |
| 10 | E2open | Consumer goods and electronics firms that plan with retailers, suppliers and carriers on one network | No | Quoted |
| 11 | Arkieva | Chemical and process manufacturers who want planners to keep the final say | No | Quoted |
- 1
Kinaxis ranks first because its trust center names the audits a security team asks for: SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type II, BSI C5 and ISO 27001:2022, with reports available under NDA. It also lists Azure regions and subprocessors by country. The AI page describes composable agents and workflows. No price or accuracy figure is shown, and the project effort belongs to a large organization.
Strong on
- Trust center lists SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type II, BSI C5 and ISO 27001:2022
- Subprocessor table names Azure hosting across the EEA, US, Canada, Japan and Australia
- AI page describes agents built from reusable skills, workflows and connected tools
Weak on
- No pricing is published, so cost comparison starts only after a sales process
- Audit documents require an NDA before a prospect can read them
Skip it if: Distributors and small manufacturers that need reorder proposals within weeks and have no dedicated planning team. No prices are printed; the vendor sells Maestro through a demo and a negotiated contract.
- 2
ToolsGroup comes second because its trust page states that the SaaS runs in Tier 3-plus data centers and that a customer can pick the region for data residency. The Decion platform is described as probabilistic and always on, covering demand, inventory, pricing and execution. The page cites provider-level ISO and SOC benchmarks, not a ToolsGroup audit report.
Strong on
- Trust page offers a region choice to meet data residency needs
- Decion covers probabilistic demand, multi-echelon inventory and replenishment in one product
- About page reports 400-plus customers in more than 45 countries
Weak on
- ISO 27001 and SOC statements describe the cloud provider, not ToolsGroup itself
- Pricing and implementation durations are not shown anywhere on the site
Skip it if: Companies that need a stated vendor-level SOC 2 report in hand before the first demo. Quote only; the trust page and website show no subscription figures.
- 3
o9 earns third place for a security page that lists ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 1, SOC 2 and GDPR, plus encryption at rest and in transit. Its AI page explains the Digital Brain, built on Enterprise Knowledge Graphs with built-in explainability. The coverage is wide, and the price, tenancy and customer data policies are left to the sales process.
Strong on
- Security page lists ISO/IEC 27001 and 27017, SOC 1, SOC 2 and GDPR
- Enterprise Knowledge Graph holds data relationships and constraints as context for models
- AI page claims built-in explainability and safety for agent actions
Weak on
- No pricing or implementation scope on any page checked
- Whether customer data trains shared models was not found on the pages read
Skip it if: Mid-sized firms with one ERP and a small planning team, where a broad graph adds more than it returns. Not shown; o9 Solutions publishes no plan list or per-user price.
- 4
Slimstock is fourth because it pairs a European head office in Deventer with a stated ISO 27001:2022 certification and a long customer list of 1,700-plus. Slim4 covers supply, assortment and production planning and focuses on availability and excess stock. The pages say little about machine learning methods, so AI depth is the weakest among the top five.
Strong on
- Security page states ISO 27001:2022 certification across development
- Contact page names Deventer in the Netherlands as headquarters and lists 600-plus professionals
- Slim4 covers consensus forecasting, new-product demand and end-of-life management
Weak on
- The planning pages describe outcomes, not the forecasting models or agents behind them
- No price list or implementation timeline is published
Skip it if: Buyers whose main requirement is autonomous AI agents acting across several systems. Quote only; Slim4 pricing is not shown on the product pages.
- 5
Lokad ranks fifth for being the most candid page in the group. Its security FAQ says it holds neither ISO 27001 nor SOC 2, explains why, names Azure as host and Microsoft as the only third party with personal data access. The approach is probabilistic forecasting written in Envision by supply chain scientists. That is flexible, but it is not a point-and-click planner.
Strong on
- Security FAQ answers certification questions directly and names Microsoft Azure as host
- Probabilistic forecasting and demand response modeling are written in code the buyer can read
- Company history states Paris origins in 2008 and an Envision release in 2014
Weak on
- No ISO 27001 or SOC 2 report exists, which fails some procurement checklists
- Logic lives in Envision, a language specific to Lokad, so planners depend on its scientists
Skip it if: Teams that want self-service dashboards and a planner screen without an engineering-style project. No subscription price is published on the pages read.
- 6
GAINS sits sixth because its agent page is specific about control: DEO executes approved tasks, runs scenario comparisons before acting and keeps audit trails. The GAINS Connect API page names SAP, Oracle NetSuite and Salesforce as exchange partners. The site shows no certification or hosting statement on the pages read, so security checks begin after the demo.
Strong on
- DEO agent runs only approved tasks and keeps audit trails for governance
- GAINS Connect API exchanges orders, policies and forecasts with SAP, NetSuite and Salesforce
- Platform covers MEIO, replenishment, production planning and network design in one suite
Weak on
- No certification or hosting region statement on the pages read
- No pricing, and the case study figures such as 976 percent ROI come from the vendor
Skip it if: Buyers who need certifications and hosting regions confirmed on public pages before contact. Not published; the site asks visitors to request a demo.
- 7
John Galt is seventh because Atlas pairs planning with an agent called Galt AI that states role-based permissions, remembered context and humans in control. The integration page speaks of multiple ERPs, CRMs and WMS feeds consolidated into one layer. The pages give no certification, hosting or price details, so the agent claims remain unverified without a trial.
Strong on
- Galt AI respects role-based permissions and remembers context in conversation
- Atlas integration page reports consolidating several ERPs and manufacturing systems
- Privacy policy lists an Austin, Texas address for the company
Weak on
- No security certification or hosting statement on the pages read
- Agent behavior is described in marketing terms, with no screenshots of approval flows
Skip it if: Security teams that must review a SOC 2 report or hosting regions from the public site first. Quote only; the site offers an RFP form and demo requests.
- 8
Oracle Fusion Cloud SCM Planning is eighth because its product page describes AI and agentic applications for demand, supply and sales and operations planning, yet it states no planning-specific audit or hosting facts. Its value is suite fit: demand, supply, S&OP and collaboration connect with Fusion ERP. A buyer outside the Oracle estate carries a heavier integration load.
Strong on
- Page describes built-in AI and agentic applications to forecast and segment demand
- Covers demand management, supply planning, S&OP and supply chain collaboration
- Names customers such as Wolseley, GE Power and DeRoyal in case stories
Weak on
- No pricing or certification list on the planning page
- Value falls if the rest of the business runs on a non-Oracle ERP
Skip it if: Mid-market firms on a different ERP that want a quick, low-cost planning rollout. The planning page lists no prices; subscriptions are arranged through Oracle sales.
- 9
EazyStock ranks ninth because it is the narrowest tool here: forecasting, safety stock and supplier orders for firms that keep their ERP. The pricing page says ongoing support, upgrades and a customer success manager are included. An LLM help assistant answers questions about stock. The privacy policy names Syncron of Stockholm, so ownership sits outside the brand name.
Strong on
- Pricing page says support, upgrades and a customer success manager carry no extra fee
- Connects to Business Central, NetSuite, Acumatica, Epicor, SAP and others by named list
- AI Help Assistant answers stock questions in plain language and exports the results
Weak on
- Scope stops at inventory and replenishment planning, with no production or S&OP depth
- Privacy policy belongs to Syncron, and AI data use details were not found
Skip it if: Manufacturers that need capacity-constrained production planning or sales and operations processes. A standard price list based on users and SKUs exists, but no figures are shown.
- 10
E2open lands tenth because its planning is tied to a wider platform of channel, logistics, trade and supply products, and its owner changed: the home page announces that WiseTech Global completed its acquisition. The AI page promises generative tools for unstructured data. The customer security policy page lists few verifiable controls, and the planning content is general.
Strong on
- Connected planning shares data with partners through the E2net open partner network
- AI page applies generative AI to unstructured supply chain data
- Privacy policy lists a mailing address in Addison, Texas
Weak on
- Ownership by WiseTech Global may change roadmap and contracts
- Customer security policy page shows few audit or hosting specifics
Skip it if: Single-site manufacturers that need planning alone and no partner network or trade modules. No prices shown; connected planning is bundled into broader network contracts.
- 11
Arkieva closes the list because its pages offer the least on AI and security, though the positioning is clear: it targets process manufacturers, reports work with more than 300 companies over 20 years and says clients want decision support, not automation. The demand page mentions adaptive AI and self-learning algorithms. No certification, hosting or price is stated.
Strong on
- Founding statement says it has worked with more than 300 companies for over 20 years
- Demand planning page lists adaptive AI, sentiment analysis and promotion planning
- Gartner Challenger placement is cited for the eleventh year in a row
Weak on
- No certification, hosting or data policy on the pages checked
- Supply pages claim autopilot planning while another page prefers decision support, so automation scope is unclear
Skip it if: Retail or distribution firms looking for agentic automation and a published security page. Quote only; Arkieva publishes no prices on its product pages.
How these AI supply chain planning software were judged
How do you judge the quality of AI in supply chain planning software?
Judge the AI by how much of a plan it changes and whether a planner can reverse it. Kinaxis describes composable agents that monitor conditions and investigate exceptions, and it speaks of shifting human effort toward oversight. GAINS says its DEO agent runs approved tasks with audit trails, and John Galt states that humans stay in control. Arkieva takes the other side and says its clients want decision support, not decision automation. Lokad bets on probabilistic forecasts written in its own language. No page here publishes a forecast error figure with a method, so ask each vendor to rerun your last year of history and compare the results against your own plan.
What does supply chain planning software cost, and who prints a price?
None of the eleven vendors prints a price list in November 2026. EazyStock says it works from a standard price list that depends on users and SKU counts, with support, training and upgrades included and a quote produced in minutes. Every other product is sold through a demo and a negotiated contract. The cost that matters is therefore implementation, not the subscription. Ask each vendor for a quote split into license, integration work, extra modules and renewal increases. Large platforms tend to charge by module and region, while mid-market tools price by users and item counts, so the same company can get quotes far apart.
Where is planning data stored and which certifications are stated?
Kinaxis offers the most detail. Its trust center lists SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type II, BSI C5 and ISO 27001:2022 documents under NDA, and names Microsoft Azure as the host across the EEA, US, Canada, Japan and Australia. o9 lists ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, SOC 1, SOC 2 and GDPR. ToolsGroup says its cloud provider infrastructure meets ISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 1, 2 and 3 and that customers can choose a region. Slimstock states ISO 27001:2022. Lokad answers that it holds neither ISO 27001 nor SOC 2 and explains why. Training policies for customer data were not stated on most pages.
How hard is it to leave a planning platform once the model is built?
Leaving is hard because the planning model, not the data, is what you build. Years of tuned forecasts, segmentation rules and scenario setups live inside the vendor's engine. Kinaxis and o9 work on proprietary models, and Lokad stores your logic in Envision, a language it created in 2014, so that code runs nowhere else. Mid-market tools such as EazyStock and Slimstock sit beside an ERP and keep the master data there, which makes a switch smaller. Before signing, ask for a full export of parameters, forecasts and history in open formats, and confirm who owns the models built during the project.
Which company size and industry does each planning tool fit?
Fit follows the shape of your supply chain. Arkieva says it looks for companies that treat planning as a core skill and prefers a step-by-step rollout. Its pages focus on chemical, process, food and consumer goods plants. Slimstock reports 1,700-plus customers and sells to distribution and retail. EazyStock was built for small and mid-sized wholesalers on ERPs such as Business Central, NetSuite and Acumatica. Oracle suits firms that already run Fusion applications. ToolsGroup, Kinaxis and o9 fit global groups with many sites. E2open fits those who need partner and channel data in the plan, now under WiseTech Global ownership.
How to choose an AI supply chain planning software in three steps
- Rerun last year's plan before you sign a contract. Pick a product family, a quarter you remember well and a stockout or surplus that hurt. Ask each shortlisted vendor to load your history and show what its model would have forecast and ordered, with the settings visible. Compare against what your team actually did, not against a generic benchmark. Check how long the vendor needed to prepare the data, since that time repeats at every site you add. If a vendor refuses a paid proof of value on your own data, treat its accuracy claims as marketing material and rank it lower.
- Decide who may approve what an agent does. List ten routine planning actions, such as moving a purchase order, changing safety stock or releasing a production batch. For each, decide whether an agent may act alone, propose for approval or stay out. Then ask vendors to show that setting in the product, together with the audit trail of who approved what. GAINS and John Galt both state that approved or role-limited actions apply, while Arkieva avoids automation altogether. Treat any product that cannot show an approval log as a forecasting tool with a chat window.
- Price the integration, not the license. Request a written plan for connecting your ERP, warehouse and supplier data, including who builds the connectors and who maintains them after go-live. Ask whether the vendor reads your system directly or needs a data lake in between, since that changes the project cost. Mid-market tools often connect to a named list of ERPs in weeks, while enterprise platforms need integrators for months. Add the integrator's day rate to your comparison, because it often exceeds the first year of subscription fees.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best AI supply chain planning software in 2026?
Kinaxis ranks first here because its trust center lists SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type II, BSI C5 and ISO 27001:2022 audits and names Azure hosting regions. ToolsGroup suits buyers who want to choose a data region, and Slimstock suits European mid-market firms. Fit depends on size, so test two vendors on your own history.
How much does supply chain planning software cost?
No vendor on this list prints a price. EazyStock says it uses a standard price list based on users and SKU counts, and the others quote after a demo. Budget for implementation and integration as well, because those costs often exceed the first year of subscription for enterprise platforms. Ask for a quote split by module, region and renewal terms.
Is supply chain planning software the same as an ERP?
No. An ERP records transactions such as orders, invoices and stock movements. Planning software reads that data and works out what to buy, make and move next, using forecasts and constraints. Oracle sells both and connects them, while EazyStock and Slimstock sit beside an ERP such as Business Central or NetSuite and write order proposals back.
What is an AI agent in supply chain planning?
An agent is software that monitors plans, investigates an exception and then proposes or performs an action. GAINS says its DEO agent executes approved tasks with audit trails, and Kinaxis describes agents composed from skills, workflows and connected tools. Ask each vendor whether agents can act without approval and where the log of their actions is kept.
Does a planning tool need ISO 27001 or SOC 2?
Not by law, but many procurement teams ask for it. Kinaxis, o9, Slimstock and ToolsGroup state ISO or SOC statements on their pages, in ToolsGroup's case through its cloud provider infrastructure. Lokad states that it holds neither and relies on other controls. Decide in advance whether a certificate is a hard requirement for your security team.
How long does it take to implement supply chain planning software?
The vendors here do not print durations. Mid-market tools such as EazyStock describe a three-step setup with a customer success manager: connect the ERP, sync stock data, then start forecasting. Enterprise platforms involve integrators, data cleaning and several waves. Ask for a project plan with dated milestones and name which tasks your own staff must perform.
Which supply chain planning vendors are European?
Slimstock is headquartered in Deventer in the Netherlands, according to its contact page, and Lokad was created in Paris in 2008. EazyStock sits under Syncron, whose privacy policy gives a Stockholm seat. The rest of the list is American or Canadian. European headquarters does not guarantee European hosting, so ask where the data runs.
Can a small company use enterprise planning platforms?
It is possible but rarely sensible. Enterprise platforms assume dedicated planners, integrators and multi-year budgets. A distributor with a few thousand items usually gets more from EazyStock or Slimstock, which connect to a named list of ERPs and focus on reorder points and supplier orders. Move to a platform when many sites, bills of materials and suppliers interact.