AI Tool Compare

Software advice

Best AI Supply Chain Visibility Software in 2026

AI supply chain visibility software is a cloud platform that collects tracking and status data on shipments, assets or suppliers, predicts arrival times or disruptions, and alerts planners to exceptions, increasingly through AI agents or assistants. It is not a transportation management system that books freight, nor a planning tool that sets inventory targets, although several vendors sell both beside their tracking.

Quick answer

project44 ranks first because it names AI Agents, a no-code Agentic Workflow Manager and the Mo analyst, and covers every transport mode. FourKites fits buyers who want a stated SOC 2 Type II claim. Sensolus fits asset owners who want printed tiers and hardware rates.

A logistics or procurement lead shopping for visibility faces three problems at once: shipments that run late, suppliers several tiers down that nobody watches, and vendors that now attach AI agents to every pitch. The vendor pages show far less about what that AI does with your data, what a tracked shipment costs, and whether visibility is the product or a module in a larger suite. This ranking weighs the breadth of what each vendor names, how much of the data handling and pricing is printed, and how narrow the scope is. We read vendor pages in November 2026 and ran no tool, so every capability is the vendor's own description.

The 13 best AI supply chain visibility software in 2026, ranked

There is no score. Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. How we rank.

#ToolBest forFree planEntry price
1project44Shippers that want tracking, AI agents and an analyst assistant from one vendor NoQuoted
2FourKitesShippers whose security team wants a stated SOC 2 Type II claim and a plain-language AI assistant NoQuoted
3ShippeoTeams tracking road, rail, sea and air shipments that want AI-driven ETAs NoQuoted
4SensolusOperators of trailers, containers or equipment fleets who want tracker hardware, tiers and an MCP connector NoEUR 1 per asset per month for location tags, plan fees not published
5Everstream AnalyticsRisk teams that need to see sub-tier suppliers and receive human-checked disruption alerts NoQuoted
6TransporeonShippers and carriers that want visibility inside a freight marketplace and dock management suite NoQuoted
7DescartesCompanies already using Descartes modules for routing, trade compliance or transportation management NoQuoted
8PrewaveProcurement teams that watch multi-tier supplier risk and want data in their own AI assistant NoQuoted
9SupplyOnManufacturers coordinating direct materials with suppliers who need control towers and stock views NoQuoted
10EverysensRail freight operators and shippers that want a control tower plus an AI scheduling assistant NoQuoted
11ShiptifyShippers wanting a transport management system with dock appointments and a control tower NoQuoted
12TIMOCOMRoad freight forwarders who already use a freight exchange and want tracking inside it TrialQuoted
13NexxiotRail and intermodal operators that will fit gateways to wagons and containers NoQuoted
  1. 1
    Not stated on the vendor pages

    project44 takes first place because its pages name the most AI products aimed at visibility work: AI Agents, a no-code Agentic Workflow Manager and Mo, an analyst that answers questions from supply chain data. It also positions inventory in transit across every mode. Against that, no price is shown, the policy texts behind the privacy index were not opened, and the footer carries no imprint, so contract and data terms need a sales conversation.

    Strong on

    • Inventory in transit visibility is presented across every transport mode, not one carrier network
    • Names three AI products: AI Agents, the Agentic Workflow Manager and the Mo analyst

    Weak on

    • No published prices; demo and contact-sales are the only routes seen on the pages
    • Privacy policy texts and any security page were not opened, so data terms are unverified

    Skip it if: Buyers who need a published price list or a stated hosting region before they will talk to sales. No price is published; the pages offer only a demo request and a contact-sales form.

  2. 2
    FourKites, Inc.

    FourKites ranks second because its privacy notice answers more buyer questions than most pages in this group: SOC 2 Type II is stated, retention follows the customer for processor data, and hosting is in the United States. FourSight AI answers questions in plain language, and named agents sit beside it. The cost is no price, and no ISO 27001 statement, so a European buyer with residency rules must ask about the United States hosting.

    Strong on

    • Privacy notice states SOC 2 Type II and explains retention for processor and controller data
    • FourSight AI lets staff ask supply chain questions in plain language, with named agents beside it

    Weak on

    • Notice states information sits on infrastructure in the United States, which matters for residency rules
    • No published prices; the only commercial link is an advisor conversation

    Skip it if: European buyers that require data to stay in the EU, since the notice names United States hosting. No price is published; the homepage links only to a conversation with an Outcome Advisor.

  3. 3
    Not stated on the vendor pages

    Shippeo sits third because it combines multimodal coverage with a clear AI story: ETA predictions on their own product page and Shippeo AI, agents that watch a shipping network and raise insights. The vendor says these agents run on verified data. What holds it below the first two is evidence: the privacy-policy URL returned an error, no integration list was found and no price or certification appears on the pages opened.

    Strong on

    • Handles four modes, road, rail, sea and air, within a single platform according to the homepage
    • Dedicated product page for AI-powered ETAs and data quality, plus Shippeo AI agents

    Weak on

    • Privacy-policy page returned an error, so retention, hosting and certifications are unverified
    • No integration catalog or API details were found on the pages opened

    Skip it if: Buyers who must see a price, a certification list or an integration catalog before a demo. No price is published; the only routes shown are a demo, an expert call or logging in.

  4. 4
    Not stated on the vendor pages

    Sensolus ranks fourth because it prints more than any shipment-tracking vendor above it: three named tiers with feature lists, hardware at EUR 6 a month per smart tracker and EUR 1 per location tag, and an MCP connector for Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot or Mistral. It loses places on scope, since visibility is per tracked asset rather than per shipment, and the plan fees themselves stay unpublished.

    Strong on

    • Pricing page lists Essential, Professional and Analytics tiers with what each adds
    • Sensolus MCP Connector feeds asset data into Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot or Mistral

    Weak on

    • Visibility starts with installed trackers and tags, so it covers assets, not third-party shipments
    • SSO, audit logs and custom branding are add-ons with no published price

    Skip it if: Shippers that move freight on carriers' vehicles and cannot fit their own devices to the goods. Hardware is priced all-in per asset; Essential, Professional and Analytics plan fees are not published.

  5. 5
    Everstream Analytics GmbH and Resilience 360 Inc. (d/b/a Everstream Analytics)

    Everstream Analytics ranks fifth because it answers a different visibility question: which hidden sub-tier suppliers and events threaten supply, shown through 24/7 alerts that the vendor calls AI-driven and human-validated. That is useful beside a tracking tool, but it does not follow individual shipments. The privacy page also contradicts itself on hosting, naming both Germany and the United States, and gives two addresses for the entity.

    Strong on

    • Sub-Tier Visibility maps and monitors suppliers beyond Tier-1 to remove blind spots
    • Alerts are described as 24/7, AI-driven and checked by people for a specific supply chain

    Weak on

    • Privacy page names servers in Germany and in the United States, so residency is unclear
    • Risk and supplier focus means no shipment-level tracking on the pages opened

    Skip it if: Logistics teams that want ETAs and carrier status for each load rather than supplier risk alerts. No price is published; the homepage offers a product walkthrough and a contact form.

  6. 6
    Transporeon GmbH

    Transporeon is sixth because visibility is one of four named solutions, next to a freight marketplace, dock and yard management and freight audit. Predictive ETAs, AI agents for carrier onboarding and the Trimble Arc Agent are named on the homepage. The suite suits a buyer who wants the whole logistics flow in one place, but a buyer who only needs shipment tracking pays attention to the breadth, and no price or data policy was verifiable.

    Strong on

    • Execution and Visibility sits beside freight marketplace, dock and yard, and freight audit solutions
    • Homepage names predictive ETAs, Autonomous Procurement, Autonomous Quotation and an agent for carrier onboarding

    Weak on

    • Primarily a transportation platform, so tracking is one module among four
    • Privacy-policy URL returned an error, and the imprint was not opened

    Skip it if: Teams that only need to track shipments and would rather not adopt a marketplace and yard suite. No price is published; the call to action on the homepage leads to a demo page.

  7. 7
    The Descartes Systems Group Inc

    Descartes lands seventh because Supply Chain Visibility, with real-time shipment tracking and proactive alerts, is only one module in a broad suite that also covers transportation management, trade compliance and inventory forecasting. The AI items named are planning, outreach, exception handling and screening. It rewards buyers who will use several modules, while someone shopping for tracking alone meets a large catalog and no stated price or data policy.

    Strong on

    • Supply Chain Visibility offers real-time tracking, proactive alerts and risk monitoring
    • AI and Automation covers planning, outreach and exception handling inside transportation management

    Weak on

    • Visibility is one module among many, so the buying process is suite-shaped
    • Privacy-policy URL returned an error and the footer shows no office address

    Skip it if: Small teams wanting a stand-alone tracking product without a suite sales process. No price is published; the homepage offers contact and meeting booking only.

  8. 8
    Prewave, GmbH

    Prewave takes eighth place because it is a supplier risk platform first and a visibility product second. Multi-Tier Visibility looks beyond Tier-1 without supplier surveys, and AI Connectors let staff query Prewave data from an AI assistant or agent. Those are concrete, but only the homepage was opened, shipment-level tracking is not the core, and the privacy-policy URL returned an error, so data handling remains unchecked.

    Strong on

    • Multi-Tier Visibility shows risks beyond Tier-1 suppliers without sending supplier surveys
    • AI Connectors expose Prewave data to any AI assistant or agent the buyer already uses

    Weak on

    • Supplier risk is the core, so shipment-level tracking is not what the homepage sells
    • Only the homepage was opened and the privacy-policy URL returned an error

    Skip it if: Logistics planners who need per-shipment ETAs and exception handling for carriers on live loads. No price is published; the homepage offers a demo, an expert call and a login.

  9. 9
    SupplyOn GmbH

    SupplyOn ranks ninth because its visibility is built for direct materials: Realtime Visibility with Control Towers and Stock Visibility sit inside a platform that also runs purchasing, quality and finance. AI-native sourcing and document extraction are named on the homepage. That fits a manufacturer coordinating suppliers, but freight-level tracking is not the main product, and the imprint, prices and data terms were not available on the pages opened.

    Strong on

    • Realtime Visibility with Control Towers and Stock Visibility target direct materials supply
    • Navigation names AI-native sourcing and AI-based document extraction in finance

    Weak on

    • Aimed at direct materials supply chains, not freight shipment tracking
    • No price on the pages opened, and the imprint contents were not checked

    Skip it if: Distributors and shippers whose main need is carrier-level ETAs rather than supplier stock coordination. No price is published; the homepage offers demo requests and a link to a store.

  10. 10
    Not stated on the vendor pages

    Everysens is tenth because it is narrow by design: a Transportation and Visibility Management System for rail freight, billed as a control tower. RALF, the AI transport assistant, builds transport schedules in minutes around stated constraints, according to the vendor. A rail shipper will find that specific, while a multimodal buyer will not. No price, legal name or data policy was found on the pages opened.

    Strong on

    • Rail freight control tower with real-time visibility of operations on the homepage
    • RALF is the vendor's AI powered transport assistant for building schedules

    Weak on

    • Rail focus means the page reads as a rail TMS more than multimodal visibility
    • Legal notice and privacy policy were linked but not opened

    Skip it if: Shippers whose freight mostly moves by road, sea or air rather than rail. No price is published; the primary homepage call to action is a demo booking.

  11. 11
    Not stated on the vendor pages

    Shiptify holds eleventh because tracking is one feature of a transport management system and a dock appointment tool, not a stand-alone visibility product. It does explain how pricing works: a usage grid based on flow volume, type of operations and equipped sites, with no commitment beyond the first two months, which cover setup fees. An artificial intelligence section automates transport operations, but the pages opened give no other details.

    Strong on

    • Pricing page explains the grid and states that only the first two months, covering setup, are committed
    • ShiptiDock handles warehouse appointment booking with visibility over deliveries

    Weak on

    • Visibility sits inside a TMS and dock product, not a stand-alone tracking tool
    • Legal notice contents were not opened, so the company name is unconfirmed

    Skip it if: Teams that already run a transport management system and only want an add-on tracking layer. Rates follow a usage grid by flow volume, operations and equipped sites, quoted after a questionnaire.

  12. 12
    TIMOCOM GmbH API

    TIMOCOM ranks twelfth because its tracking is attached to a road freight marketplace. Live Shipment Tracking monitors status in real time with automatic ETA calculation and status updates, and the page offers a free trial, which most rivals here do not. The scope is road only, no AI feature is named on the page opened, and the legal notice contents were not captured.

    Strong on

    • Live Shipment Tracking gives real-time status, automatic ETAs and automatic status updates
    • Page offers a free test and states that APIs come with the services

    Weak on

    • Road freight only on the page opened, with tracking inside a marketplace product
    • No price for the tracking service and no AI feature named

    Skip it if: Shippers moving rail, sea or air freight, or buyers who want AI features named on the page. The page offers a free test but publishes no price for the tracking service itself.

  13. 13
    Not stated on the vendor pages

    Nexxiot closes the list because its offer depends on hardware and names no AI capability on the page opened. Edge and Globehopper gateways feed the Connect Intelligent Cloud, which gives real-time insight into rail and intermodal operations. A news headline mentions a tie-up with Pairpoint on rail supply chain visibility. For an operator that owns wagons the model fits, but nothing else was verifiable.

    Strong on

    • Edge and Globehopper gateways supply the hardware layer for rail and intermodal assets
    • Connect Intelligent Cloud is the software layer giving real-time insight into operations

    Weak on

    • Visibility starts with installed gateways, so third-party freight stays unseen
    • No AI capability, price or data policy appeared on the opened homepage

    Skip it if: Shippers that rely on carriers and cannot mount devices on wagons or containers. No price is published; the homepage offers a contact form and a subscribe link.

How these AI supply chain visibility software were judged

What does AI actually do in supply chain visibility tools?

The AI claims fall into three groups: predicted ETAs, agents that act on exceptions, and assistants that answer questions. project44 names AI Agents, an Agentic Workflow Manager and the Mo analyst. FourKites names FourSight AI plus Loft, Digital Workers and Sophie. Shippeo names ETA predictions and Shippeo AI agents, Transporeon names predictive ETAs and an agent for carrier onboarding, and Everstream describes alerts as AI-driven and human-validated. TIMOCOM and Nexxiot name no AI feature on the pages we opened. None of the pages we read published accuracy figures, so test ETA error on your own lanes.

How much does supply chain visibility software cost?

Almost no vendor publishes a price. As of November 2026, project44, FourKites, Shippeo, Transporeon, Descartes, Prewave, Everstream, SupplyOn, Everysens and Nexxiot route buyers to a demo or contact form. The exceptions are small. Sensolus prints hardware at EUR 6 a month per smart tracker and EUR 1 per location tag, with plan fees quoted. Shiptify describes a usage grid by flow volume, operations and equipped sites, with setup fees in the first two months. TIMOCOM offers a free test. Expect to ask about volume bands, carrier counts and AI add-ons before any figure appears.

Where does a visibility platform keep shipment data?

Shipment data shows customers, routes and delays, so hosting and AI use matter. FourKites states SOC 2 Type II and United States hosting in its privacy notice, and says processor data retention follows the customer. Everstream's page names servers in Germany and, elsewhere, in the United States. Shippeo, Transporeon, Prewave and Descartes had privacy-policy URLs that returned errors when we checked, and most other vendors had no policy page captured. Whether customer data trains AI models was not stated by any vendor. Ask for the answer in writing before sharing carrier or customer data.

How hard is it to leave a visibility platform?

Switching costs depend on what is connected. Software-only tools hold history and carrier connections, while hardware vendors hold devices. Sensolus bundles trackers, connectivity and plan into one annual payment, and Nexxiot's gateways form the hardware layer, so leaving means replacing devices. Suite vendors such as Transporeon and Descartes tie tracking to marketplace, planning or compliance modules. Shiptify says its offer carries no commitment beyond the first two months. The pages say little about data export or API terms, apart from TIMOCOM stating that APIs come with its services. Request export and exit terms in the quote.

Which supply chain visibility tool fits your business?

Start with what you need to see. Shippers with many carriers across modes look at project44, FourKites or Shippeo. Procurement teams worried about hidden suppliers look at Everstream or Prewave. Owners of trailers, containers or wagons look at Sensolus or Nexxiot, and rail shippers at Everysens. Manufacturers coordinating direct materials fit SupplyOn, and road forwarders already on a freight exchange fit TIMOCOM. Companies already running a suite from Transporeon, Descartes or Shiptify can ask for the tracking module first. Match the tool to the thing you cannot see today.

How to choose an AI supply chain visibility platform in three steps

  1. Write down what you cannot see today. List the specific blind spots: late road shipments, ocean containers with unknown ETAs, suppliers beyond Tier-1, or trailers sitting in a yard. A shipment tracker, a risk monitor and an asset tracker solve different problems, and the vendor pages show clearly which one each product is. Everstream and Prewave watch suppliers, Sensolus and Nexxiot watch devices, and project44, FourKites and Shippeo follow shipments. Rank the blind spots by cost, then discard any vendor whose pages describe a different problem than your first-ranked one. That shortens the demo list to three or four.
  2. Ask each vendor to run your lanes in a pilot. Because prices and accuracy are not published, the only test is a pilot. Choose ten real lanes with a mix of carriers and modes, and ask for predicted ETAs next to actual arrivals after a few weeks. Check how many carriers connect without manual work and who builds the connection when one fails. Ask what the AI agents may do without approval: Sensolus states its agents act only on the user's approval, and other vendors' pages do not say. Keep the pilot scope in writing so the quote reflects it.
  3. Get data terms and exit terms before the quote. Request the privacy policy, hosting region, certification reports and the contract's exit clause in the first call. FourKites states SOC 2 Type II and United States hosting, Everstream's page contradicts itself on region, and many vendors had no policy page captured. Ask whether customer data trains any model, how long history is kept after cancellation and whether a full export is included. For hardware vendors, ask what happens to installed devices at the end of the term. Treat unanswered questions as a reason to keep sensitive customer data out of the pilot.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best AI supply chain visibility software in 2026?

project44 ranks first here because its pages name AI Agents, an Agentic Workflow Manager and the Mo analyst and describe visibility across every transport mode. FourKites is the pick for a stated SOC 2 Type II claim, and Sensolus suits asset owners who want printed tiers and hardware rates. All three still require a sales conversation for full prices.

Do supply chain visibility vendors publish their prices?

Almost none do. Most pages offer a demo request or contact form only. Sensolus prints hardware rates of EUR 6 a month per smart tracker and EUR 1 per location tag but not plan fees. Shiptify explains a usage grid without figures, and TIMOCOM offers a free test. Budget by asking for quotes that separate platform, carrier connections, AI features and hardware.

What is the difference between shipment visibility and supply chain risk monitoring?

Shipment visibility follows a specific load with status and an ETA, which is what project44, FourKites and Shippeo describe. Risk monitoring watches suppliers and events that could disrupt supply, which is Everstream and Prewave. The first answers where a shipment is now, while the second answers which supplier might fail next. Many companies end up buying one of each.

Which visibility tools use AI agents?

project44 names AI Agents and an Agentic Workflow Manager, FourKites names Loft, Digital Workers and Sophie, and Shippeo names Shippeo AI agents. Sensolus lists AI field agents and operation agents, and Transporeon names an agent for carrier onboarding. Everysens describes RALF as an AI transport assistant. TIMOCOM and Nexxiot named no AI feature on the pages we opened.

Can I plug visibility data into ChatGPT or Claude?

Two vendors state it. Sensolus offers an MCP Connector that plugs asset data into Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot or Mistral, and Prewave offers AI Connectors to query its data from any AI assistant or agent. project44 sells its own analyst, Mo. Check which plan includes the connector, because Sensolus lists AI connectors from the Professional tier upward.

Which visibility platforms state a security certification?

Only FourKites stated one on the pages we read: its privacy notice says it is SOC 2 Type II compliant and does not state ISO 27001. The other vendors either had no policy page captured or had privacy-policy URLs that returned errors. Ask any shortlisted vendor for current audit reports instead of relying on website badges.

Is there a visibility tool for rail freight?

Everysens is built for rail freight, with a Transportation and Visibility Management System billed as a control tower and an AI assistant named RALF. Nexxiot targets rail and intermodal with gateways and a cloud layer. Shippeo and project44 describe rail among their modes. Rail-specific vendors need devices or rail data feeds, so ask how wagons are connected.

Do hardware trackers beat software-only visibility?

Neither wins in general. Software-only tools such as project44 and FourKites follow shipments through carrier data and cover loads you do not own. Hardware vendors such as Sensolus and Nexxiot see your own trailers, containers or wagons directly. If carriers move your freight, devices on their vehicles are out of reach, and a software network is the realistic option.

Keep going in this category