Software advice
Best AI No-Code Database Tools in 2026
AI no-code database tools are web applications where people without programming skills define tables, link records, build forms, views and small apps, and automate routines, with AI features such as generating a table from a description, AI-filled fields or chat over the data. They are not plain spreadsheets, SQL clients or custom software projects, although several export to those.
Quick answer
Baserow ranks first because its row, storage and AI limits are printed on every plan and it can be self-hosted. SeaTable fits teams that want German data centers and euro prices. Teable fits teams that want Postgres tables with AI-built apps.
A team leaving a spreadsheet faces three questions: how many rows can the free tier hold, what does AI actually do inside the tool, and where does the data sit. Vendor pages answer these unevenly. Some print row caps and credit allowances per plan, while others show a price and little else, and one names an AI link without describing it. This ranking weighs printed limits, named AI features, data handling statements and the way a vendor describes its company. We read vendor pages in November 2026 and did not run the tools, so speed and accuracy claims stay with the vendors.
The 13 best AI no-code database tools in 2026, ranked
There is no score. Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. How we rank.
| # | Tool | Best for | Free plan | Entry price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baserow | Teams that want printed row and storage limits, AI table building and the option to self-host | Yes | $0 (Premium $10 per user per month billed yearly) |
| 2 | SeaTable | European teams that want German data centers, euro pricing and a cloud or self-hosted choice | Yes | 0€ (Plus 7€ per user per month billed annually) |
| 3 | Teable | Teams that want Postgres-backed tables plus AI-built apps and automations from a process description | Yes | $0 (Pro $13 per seat per month billed yearly) |
| 4 | Grist | Spreadsheet-minded teams that want formulas, row-level access rules and a free self-hosted community edition | Yes | $0 (Pro $8 per user per month billed annually) |
| 5 | Fibery | Product and operations teams that link projects, documents and customers in one connected workspace | Yes | €0 (Standard €12 per user per month billed annually) |
| 6 | Notion | Teams whose databases live next to wikis, notes and docs rather than replacing a spreadsheet | Yes | €0 (Plus €9.50 per member per month) |
| 7 | SmartSuite | Operations teams that want AI agents and workflow builders inside a work-management style database | Trial | $15 per seat per month billed annually |
| 8 | NocoDB | Developers and data teams that want a spreadsheet interface over their own Postgres or MySQL database | Yes | $0 (Plus $12 per seat per month billed annually) |
| 9 | Stackby | Small teams that want cheap seats, Stackby AI fields and automations around templates | Yes | $0 (Economy $9 per seat monthly, $4.2 billed annually) |
| 10 | Ragic | Back-office teams that want form-style database sheets, ISO-certified hosting and an on-premises option | Yes | $0 (Lite $5 per user per month) |
| 11 | Knack | Organizations that publish client portals and member apps with unlimited users on a flat price | Trial | $49 per month billed annually (Starter) |
| 12 | Quickbase | Mid-size and large operations teams that need audit logs, sandboxes and compliance options such as HIPAA | Trial | From $35 per user per month, priced annually |
| 13 | Kintone | Teams that want one flat all-features plan and process management without comparing tiers | Trial | $24 per user per month, minimum 5 users |
- 1
Baserow ranks first because every plan prints its row, storage and automation-credit ceilings, and the AI features are named instead of implied. Kuma builds tables from a description, and an MCP server is listed. Self-hosting through Docker or Helm gives an exit route most rivals lack. The weak spot is the Free plan, which stops at 3,000 rows, and a headquarters that the pages never state.
Strong on
- Four plans with row, storage and automation-credit numbers printed for each
- Kuma builds tables from a description, and an MCP server is named
- Self-hosting through Docker, Cloudron, AWS or Helm is documented on the site
Weak on
- Free stops at 3,000 rows per workspace, so real datasets need Premium quickly
- Headquarters and hosting region are not stated on the pages we read
Skip it if: Buyers who need a stated data location or a named company seat before signing. Free covers 3,000 rows per workspace. Premium adds AI features and 50,000 rows, billed per user.
- 2
SeaTable takes second place on how much it states about itself. The imprint names a German company, the privacy page names Frankfurt and Munich data centers, and plans are listed in euros from a free tier for 25 users upward. AI credits arrive as an allowance inside each plan. It ranks below Baserow only because its Free plan allows just 12.5 AI credits a month.
Strong on
- Cloud data sits in Exoscale data centers in Frankfurt and Munich, per the privacy page
- Free tier allows 25 users, which is generous next to most seat-limited rivals
- A Server edition lets a company host SeaTable on its own machines
Weak on
- Free includes only 12.5 AI credits a month, too little for regular AI use
- Dedicated Cloud needs 100 users and shows no price figure
Skip it if: Small teams wanting heavy AI generation on a free plan, or buyers who need a printed Dedicated Cloud price. Cloud Free allows 25 users and 10,000 rows. Plus is priced per user, excluding VAT.
- 3
Teable is third because its AI is the most central to the product: Teable AI builds the database, an app and automations from a written process, and an AI step can run inside an automation. Tables sit in real Postgres and an Airtable base can be moved over in one click. Rows are capped at 1,000 on Free, and the pricing page shows two unexplained higher figures.
Strong on
- AI builds database, app and automations from a process description
- Tables are real Postgres, and an Airtable base can be moved in one click
- Every cell edit is logged with before and after values
Weak on
- Free stops at 1,000 rows and 100 automation runs
- The pricing page shows $24 and $36 figures without saying what they are
Skip it if: Buyers who want a free tier for real datasets, or an unambiguous published price sheet. Free includes 1,000 rows. Pro and Business are priced per seat, billed yearly, with monthly credits.
- 4
Grist sits fourth because it keeps spreadsheet logic, formulas included, while adding relational tables and access rules down to each row and column. The AI Assistant can create and modify records and formulas. Pricing is clear and low, and the community edition is free to host yourself. The Free plan gives only 100 AI credits one time, and the pages never name a headquarters.
Strong on
- Access rules restrict who sees what down to each row and column
- AI Assistant creates and edits records and formulas from chat
- Snapshot history runs 30 days on Free and up to five years on Business
Weak on
- Free grants 100 AI Assistant credits one time, not monthly
- Record caps of 5,000 on Free and 100,000 on Pro apply per document
Skip it if: Teams that need a relational app builder with portals, or a vendor that states where it is based. Free allows 5,000 records per document. Pro and Business are per user, with Business at a 5-user minimum.
- 5
Fibery lands fifth because it is built for linking: contracts, clients, teams and tasks sit in related databases, with Gantt, timeline and map views. The privacy policy says content sent to its AI features is not used to train models, which few rivals state. Data residency choice is limited to the €40 Enterprise tier, and the product is more workspace than plain database.
Strong on
- Privacy policy says AI providers do not train on content sent to AI features
- Free plan allows 10 users and unlimited entities
- Observers and guests cost nothing on paid plans
Weak on
- Choice of US, EU, UK or APAC data residency starts at Enterprise
- Monthly prices are not listed in the text we read
Skip it if: Buyers who want a simple table tool, or EU residency without paying the Enterprise rate. Free covers up to 10 users and 10 databases. Paid plans are per user, billed annually, with free guests.
- 6
Notion ranks sixth because its databases are a part of a wider workspace, not the main product. Free includes databases with dependencies, and Business adds Notion Agent and granular database permissions. The security page states that customer data is never used to train AI models. Row ceilings and record-heavy tooling are weaker than the database-first tools above it.
Strong on
- Security page states customer data is never used to train AI models
- Databases with subtasks and dependencies are included on Free
- Business adds SAML SSO and granular database permissions
Weak on
- Notion AI is only a trial on Free and Plus
- Data residency is reserved for Enterprise, and no API line was opened
Skip it if: Teams that need large record counts, relational integrity or row-level security in the database itself. Prices are shown in euros per member, with a USD option. Custom Agents cost $10 per 1,000 credits.
- 7
SmartSuite is seventh because it puts AI inside every paid plan, with a Workflow Builder Copilot and AI Field Agents, and lets customers choose a US or EU data center at sign-up. The price is not the lowest: there is no permanent free plan, Team needs three seats and Professional five. Several AI items are marked coming soon, so the list reads longer than what ships.
Strong on
- SmartSuite AI is included in Team, Professional and Enterprise
- US or EU data center is chosen at sign-up on any plan
- Professional adds Gmail and Outlook integrations and advanced permissions
Weak on
- No permanent free plan, only a 14-day trial
- Solution Copilot and Operational Agents are marked coming soon
Skip it if: Individuals or tiny teams that want a free plan, or buyers who want only features shipping today. Team has a 3-seat minimum and no permanent free plan. A 14-day Professional trial needs no card.
- 8
NocoDB comes eighth because its strength is connecting a spreadsheet-style front end to a Postgres or MySQL database you already run, and the price ladder is clear up to Scale. The pricing and homepage name no AI feature, so it trails tools that describe one. Free allows 1,000 records and 3 editors, and external database connections only arrive on Business.
Strong on
- Bring your own Postgres or MySQL, plus import from Airtable, CSV and Excel
- An ERD view shows the database schema as a visual diagram
- Printed prices at every step, with row-level security and audit logs on the Scale plan
Weak on
- No AI feature is named on the pricing or homepage
- External database connections start on Business, and Free stops at 1,000 records
Skip it if: Buyers who want AI table generation, or teams that need external databases on a low tier. Free allows 3 editor seats and 1,000 records. Plus and above are per seat, with unlimited-seat options.
- 9
Stackby is ninth because entry pricing is low and it names AI fields, templates and connections to OpenAI, Anthropic and Gemini. Row caps are modest, at 1,500 per stack on Free and 7,000 on Economy, and the top paid plan carries two names depending on the billing view. The privacy page gives no hosting region and says nothing about model training.
Strong on
- Economy costs $4.2 per user per month on annual billing
- Stackby AI Fields and AI templates are named, with OpenAI, Anthropic and Gemini listed
- Free includes 50 read-only users beside 5 editors
Weak on
- Economy allows 7,000 rows per stack, which fills fast
- The top paid plan is Pro or Business Plus depending on the billing view
Skip it if: Teams with large tables, or buyers who need a stated hosting region and training policy. Free allows 5 users and 1,500 rows per stack. Paid prices differ sharply between monthly and annual billing.
- 10
Ragic is tenth because it is a mature, form-first database tool with ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification, European servers in Belgium and Ireland on request and on-premises hosting from Professional. Ragic AI usage scales by plan. The interface is built around sheets and forms, not modern app design, and the pages we read name no API at all.
Strong on
- ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification and GDPR compliance are stated on the security page
- European servers in Belgium and Ireland are offered on request
- Professional adds an on-premises option and unlimited records
Weak on
- No API was named on the pages we read
- Free allows only three custom sheets, and Lite five
Skip it if: Developer teams that need a documented API, or buyers who want a modern app-builder interface. Free gives three sheets of 1,000 records. Lite and Professional are per user, and concurrent-user billing starts at $499.
- 11
Knack is eleventh because it prices per app, not per seat: Starter is $49 a month with unlimited users and 20,000 records, and the AI App Builder appears in every plan. That helps portals with many outside users. The AI credit allowance is small (25 on Starter), there is no permanent free plan, and Pro jumps to $110 a month.
Strong on
- Flat monthly pricing with unlimited users and roles on every paid plan
- AI App Builder is listed in all four plans
- Databases can sit in the United States, Germany or Australia
Weak on
- Starter includes just 25 AI credits and 20,000 records
- No permanent free plan, and the trial length was not shown
Skip it if: Teams that want per-seat pricing for a small group, or a free plan to keep. Starter is a flat monthly figure with unlimited users. Monthly billing shows a $19 introductory price for 3 months.
- 12
Quickbase is twelfth because it is aimed at bigger organizations and charges accordingly: Team starts at $35 and Business at $55 per user per month, before a platform minimum. AI sits in a separate AI Intelligence Pack add-on, and the page does not show which plan includes which piece. Sandbox, SCIM, and HIPAA options are real strengths for regulated teams.
Strong on
- Business adds sandbox, SSO, SCIM, Gantt charts and FDA and HIPAA compliance
- AI Chat-to-App, AI Reports and AI Workflows are named in the add-on
- A 30-day free trial that includes all Business plan features
Weak on
- AI is a paid add-on, with plan inclusion unclear on the page
- Per-user prices exclude the separate platform minimum fee
Skip it if: Small teams on a tight budget, or buyers who want AI included in the base price. Team and Business exclude the platform minimum. The free trial lasts 30 days with Business features.
- 13
Kintone closes the ranking because the vendor pages we read explain too little. The pricing page shows a single $24 plan with a 5-user minimum, and Kintone AI appears only as a navigation link with no description. The single plan is easy to budget, and Open API Connectivity is named, but the AI content, hosting and certifications are all unstated.
Strong on
- One plan includes every feature, so there are no tiers to compare
- Open API Connectivity and unlimited custom views are listed
- Trial data is deleted 30 days after the trial ends, per the privacy policy
Weak on
- Kintone AI is only a link on the pricing page, with no description
- Five seats at $120 a month is the minimum, with no free plan
Skip it if: Individuals and very small teams, or anyone who needs documented AI features and certifications. One plan with all features, $120 per month for the 5-user minimum. A 30-day trial, no free plan.
How these AI no-code database tools were judged
Which of these tools describe a concrete AI feature?
Most do, but with different weight. Baserow names Kuma, an AI Field and an MCP server, Grist an AI Assistant that edits records and formulas, and Teable an AI that builds a database and apps from a process description. SmartSuite lists Copilot and Agent features, some marked coming soon. Knack puts an AI App Builder in all four plans. NocoDB names no AI feature on its pricing page or homepage, and Kintone mentions Kintone AI only as a link. We judge on what the pages say, because we ran none of the tools and cannot rate output quality.
What does an AI no-code database cost for a small team?
Entry tiers are cheap, and free plans exist for nearly all. Baserow, SeaTable, Grist, NocoDB, Teable, Fibery, Ragic and Stackby print a $0 or 0€ plan, while Knack, SmartSuite, Quickbase and Kintone start with a trial. Paid seats run from $4.2 on Stackby annual billing to $35 on Quickbase Team. The cost driver is rarely the seat: row caps (1,000 to 5,000 on most free tiers) and monthly AI credits decide when a team must upgrade, and Quickbase adds a platform minimum.
Where is my data stored, and is it used to train models?
Only a few vendors answer both parts. SeaTable names German data centers in Frankfurt and Munich. Knack lists databases in the United States, Germany and Australia, and SmartSuite lets customers choose a US or EU data center. Fibery's policy says its AI providers do not train on submitted content, and Notion's security page says the same for customer data. Teable states OpenAI and Vercel are barred from training on content. Baserow, Grist, NocoDB, Stackby, Kintone and Quickbase leave training unstated on the pages we read, so ask before loading personal data.
How hard is it to leave one of these tools?
Self-hosting is the clearest exit. Baserow documents Docker, Cloudron, AWS and Helm installs, Grist offers a free community edition, and SeaTable sells a Server license. NocoDB lets you use your own Postgres or MySQL database, and Teable stores tables as real Postgres. Import paths run the other direction too: NocoDB imports from Airtable, CSV and Excel, and Teable moves an Airtable base in one click. Hosted-only tools such as Knack and Quickbase keep your app logic inside their platform, so test an export before you build workflows.
Which tool fits a team of ten with 50,000 rows?
The answer depends on the row cap, not the seat price. At 50,000 rows, Baserow Premium and NocoDB Plus both list that number, while Grist Pro allows 100,000 records per document and Stackby Business 50,000 per stack. Teable Pro lists 250,000 rows and SmartSuite Team only 5,000 per Solution. Teams with documents and wikis around the data should look at Fibery or Notion, and regulated teams that need audit logs, sandboxes or HIPAA options should read Quickbase and Ragic closely.
How to choose an AI no-code database tool in three steps
- Count your rows and set the plan floor. Export your largest sheet and note its row count, attachments and the number of editors. Compare that figure with each plan: Baserow Free holds 3,000 rows, Grist Free 5,000 records per document, Teable Free 1,000 rows and Stackby Free 1,500 per stack. Then read how the cap is measured, because workspace, document, stack and Solution all differ. A tool that looks cheap per seat can force the second tier on day one if your biggest table is large, so do this sum before comparing seat prices.
- Test the AI on a real table. Pick one table you maintain by hand and run the same task in each trial: build it from a description, fill a column, or answer a question over the rows. Note how many credits it used against the plan's monthly allowance, since SeaTable Free lists 12.5 credits, Knack Starter 25 and Grist Pro starts at 100. If a tool's pages do not describe an AI feature, ask the vendor in writing what exists before counting it toward your shortlist. Keep the table, prompt and result so you can repeat the test.
- Check hosting, training and exit before loading data. Open the privacy policy and trust page and write down three answers: where data sits, whether content trains models, and how you export. Where the pages are silent, ask the vendor in writing. Then try the exit: self-host a copy if the vendor allows it, or export to CSV and rebuild one view in another tool. Doing this before the team enters production data costs an afternoon, and it is much harder to learn afterward when workflows depend on the tool.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best AI no-code database tool in 2026?
Baserow ranks first here because every plan lists row, storage and automation-credit numbers, it names Kuma and an MCP server as AI features, and it can be self-hosted. SeaTable is the pick for German data centers and euro prices, and Teable for AI-built apps on Postgres. The right choice still depends on row counts and where your data must sit.
Is there a free AI no-code database?
Yes, several. Baserow, SeaTable, Grist, NocoDB, Teable, Fibery, Ragic and Stackby each list a free plan, though AI is limited there: Grist gives 100 credits one time, SeaTable 12.5 a month, and NocoDB names no AI feature. Free tiers also cap rows, from 1,000 on Teable and NocoDB to 10,000 on SeaTable.
Which no-code database tools can I host myself?
Baserow lists Docker, Cloudron, AWS and Helm, Grist offers a free community edition, SeaTable sells a Server edition with a minimum one-year term, and Ragic offers an on-premises option from its Professional plan. NocoDB's pricing mentions a community self-hosted edition at $0. Self-hosting shifts updates, backups and security to your team, so budget the time.
Does an AI no-code database train on my data?
Vendors differ. Fibery's privacy policy says neither it nor its AI providers train on content sent to AI features, Notion's security page says customer data is never used to train models, and Teable says OpenAI and Vercel are contractually barred from it. Most others leave training unstated on the pages we read, which is a question for the vendor.
Which tools suit a European company?
SeaTable states German data centers in Frankfurt and Munich and is made by a German company. Fibery is based in Cyprus and offers an EU data residency choice on Enterprise, SmartSuite lets customers pick an EU data center, and Ragic offers European servers in Belgium and Ireland on request. Check the contract for processor terms.
How much do AI no-code database tools cost per user?
Paid seats start around $4.2 per user per month on annual Stackby billing and reach $35 on Quickbase Team, with Baserow Premium at $10, Grist Pro at $8, NocoDB Plus at $12 and Teable Pro at $13 annually. Knack and Kintone differ: Knack is a flat monthly price with unlimited users, Kintone $24 per user with a 5-user minimum.
Is Airtable in this ranking?
No. Airtable is a well known database tool, but we left it out because we could not obtain a usable logo for it, and the site only lists tools with a real logo. Its pricing page shows Team at $20 and Business at $45 per user per month billed annually, and it names Airtable AI without saying which plans include it.
Can these tools replace a SQL database?
Partly. Teable stores tables as real Postgres, and NocoDB connects to your own Postgres or MySQL database, while Baserow and Grist offer APIs and webhooks. Most others keep data in their own store with row caps per plan. For heavy transactional workloads or complex joins, a managed SQL database behind a no-code front end remains the safer design.