Software advice
Best AI Video Interviewing Software in 2026
AI video interviewing software lets candidates record answers to set questions, or talk with an avatar or chat interviewer, on their own time. The platform adds transcripts, summaries and scores so recruiters can review many people quickly. It is not a meeting tool such as Zoom, and not a full applicant tracking system, though several vendors bundle one.
Quick answer
Hirevire ranks first because it prints three plans, offers a 7-day trial without a card and states that it does not train on responses. Interviewer.AI suits teams that want credit-based AI interviews with avatars. Willo suits buyers who want ISO 27001 and EU-first hosting.
A recruiter who needs to screen two hundred applicants for one role has a simple problem: calls do not scale, and reading CVs does not show how someone speaks or reasons. Video interviewing tools promise to fix that, and most now add AI transcripts, summaries and scores. The hard part is what sits behind those scores. Some vendors print prices, name their AI providers and say where recordings live, while others send you to a demo form and a general privacy notice. We read vendor pages in November 2026 and ran no candidate through any product, so this ranking rewards what a buyer can verify before signing, not interview quality.
The 11 best AI video interviewing software in 2026, ranked
There is no score. Vendors can pay for more visibility on this website, for example a higher place in a ranking or more room on a page. Commercial relationships can also affect which products we feature and how prominently. How we rank.
| # | Tool | Best for | Free plan | Entry price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hirevire | Small teams and agencies that want self-serve plans with AI scoring included and clear retention terms | Trial | $49 per month, or $39 billed yearly, for Essentials |
| 2 | Interviewer.AI | Recruiters who want avatar-led AI interviews bought by the credit, with a short trial first | Trial | $199 per month for Essential |
| 3 | Willo | Employers that want written, video and multiple-choice screening with ISO 27001 and EU-first hosting | No | £49 per live role per month for Willo Lite |
| 4 | Hireflix | Small and mid-size companies that want unlimited one-way interviews at a flat monthly price | Trial | $75 per month, billed yearly, for Small |
| 5 | Spark Hire | US hiring teams that want video interviews bundled with assessments, reference checks or an ATS | No | From $249 per month, billed annually, for video interviews |
| 6 | Cammio | European employers that want one-way and live video with all data in a Frankfurt data center | No | From €620 per month, single plan |
| 7 | VidCruiter | Enterprise and public-sector employers running structured interviews with scoring, scheduling and fraud checks | No | Quoted |
| 8 | Jobma | High-volume screening teams that need an AI interviewer, proctoring and many ATS connections | No | Quoted |
| 9 | Talview | Organizations that need AI interviewing together with proctoring, identity checks and exam security | No | Quoted |
| 10 | Tengai | Employers that want a Swedish avatar interviewer running a structured, personality-based first screen | No | Quoted |
| 11 | HireVue | Large employers combining on-demand video, assessments and an AI Interviewer under legal review | No | Quoted |
- 1
Hirevire takes first place because a buyer can verify the most: three priced plans, a 7-day trial without a card, AI features included with no credits, and a privacy policy that says responses do not train AI models. It lists its subprocessors and a 90-day default video deletion. It trails on certifications, since the page shows seals but names no audit report.
Strong on
- Essentials, Professional and Agency prices are printed, from $39 a month billed yearly
- Privacy policy states responses are not used to train AI and names every subprocessor
- Answer scoring from 1 to 5 shows reasoning against weighted criteria you set
Weak on
- Video is deleted after 90 days by default, and longer storage costs $9 a month
- The policy gives no street address, so the company country comes from a Mumbai footer
Skip it if: Large employers that need ATS-native workflows, single sign-on and a vendor with a long list of named audits. Essentials covers 1 active job and 300 interviews a year. AI scoring and transcripts are unlimited on every paid plan.
- 2
Interviewer.AI sits second because credit pricing is printed, the trial lets you test five assessments, and its privacy policy names OpenAI, Anthropic and Google as readers of transcript text only. It states hosting regions, including Frankfurt for EU and UK employers. It ranks under Hirevire since ATS links are Enterprise-only and no refunds are given.
Strong on
- Credits roll over monthly, and top-up packs start at $150 for 50 credits
- Privacy policy names the AI providers and says raw video is not sent to them
- Hosting runs in Singapore, with Frankfurt available for EU and UK employer accounts
Weak on
- ATS integrations and data residency choices are listed only for the custom Enterprise tier
- Avatar interviews keep raw video and audio for audit, unlike the standard pipeline
Skip it if: Buyers who need a refund policy, or who want ATS integration without an enterprise contract. Essential includes 50 interview credits a month. A conversational AI interview costs 2 credits, a standard one costs 1.
- 3
Willo ranks third because its pay-per-role Lite plan and a printed Enterprise starting price are easy to compare, the company states ISO 27001, and its privacy notice says data is primarily hosted in the EU. Willo Intelligence adds summaries and benchmarks. The notice does not address AI training, and SSO and ATS links sit only in Enterprise.
Strong on
- Lite is pay as you go with no contract, and Enterprise has a printed starting price
- ISO 27001 certification and a public Trust Center are named on the pricing page
- Questions can be video, audio, written, multiple choice or identity steps
Weak on
- Privacy notice does not say whether customer data trains AI models
- SSO, 12-month retention and ATS connection are Enterprise features, not Lite
Skip it if: Teams that need ATS sync on a small budget, or that want a free trial before paying. Lite allows 5 live roles and 150 assessed candidates per role. Enterprise starts at £2,999 a year.
- 4
Hireflix is fourth because it prices by company size, gives unlimited seats and responses on every plan, and offers a month free. It states SOC 2 compliance and lists many ATS integrations. The pricing and home pages describe no AI beyond transcriptions, and its privacy policy names no hosting region or subprocessors. Annual billing is advertised as saving 50 percent over monthly.
Strong on
- Flat Small and Medium prices include unlimited seats, positions and responses
- Native integrations include Greenhouse, Lever, Workable, Ashby and Teamtailor
- Automatic candidate video deletion and audit logs are listed under security
Weak on
- Privacy policy names no hosting region, no AI provider and says nothing about AI training
- Larger or agency buyers get no printed price, only a Custom tier through contact
Skip it if: Buyers who want AI scoring and summaries as headline features, or an itemized subprocessor list. Small suits companies under 50 employees, Medium (50 to 250) is $150. Every plan has unlimited seats.
- 5
Spark Hire is fifth because prices are public for video, assessment and ATS products, and AI transcription, summaries and scoring are described. Its privacy policy allows AI use on anonymized and aggregated customer content, including training, and lists OpenAI as a subprocessor. API, SSO and downloads are gated, so total cost rises. Annual contracts are mandatory for its ATS products.
Strong on
- Video interviews are priced monthly or annually, with unlimited live and one-way interviews
- Transcription in 50+ languages, response summaries and scoring are listed as AI features
- 40+ ATS integrations plus Zapier and a Chrome extension
Weak on
- Policy permits training AI on anonymized, aggregated customer content, which privacy teams must review
- API access and SSO are add-ons, and interview downloads are annual-only
Skip it if: Employers that forbid any AI training on candidate content, or that need a stated hosting region. Monthly billing starts at $299 with 5 jobs and 5 users. Annual billing removes those caps.
- 6
Cammio is sixth because its hosting claim is the plainest of the group: AWS in Frankfurt with AES-256 encryption, stated in its privacy policy. It prints a single price and names its Dutch company. The pages describe no AI features and no trial, so it ranks below tools that print AI scoring and trial terms.
Strong on
- Privacy policy names AWS Frankfurt as the only storage location, encrypted with AES-256
- One price covers every feature, support and a client success manager
- Integrates with more than 20 applicant tracking systems, listed on its integrations page
Weak on
- Pages describe no AI features, so scoring or summaries are not documented
- Entry price of €620 a month is higher than most self-serve rivals
Skip it if: Buyers who want AI scoring, a free trial or a low monthly price. One plan holds all video interviewing features and a client success manager. ATS integrations and SSO are add-ons.
- 7
VidCruiter is seventh. Its security page offers five storage zones and lists SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, 27017, 27018 and Cyber Essentials, which few rivals match. The home page labels AI as assistive, and an AI Interviewer is marked coming soon. The price is hidden and no page explains AI data use. Scoring is rubric-based.
Strong on
- Data storage can be placed in Canada, USA, Europe, UK or Australia
- Security page lists SOC 2 Type II and four ISO standards
- Interview guides, weighted scoring and AI notes sit with scheduling and references
Weak on
- No price appears anywhere on the pricing page
- The security page does not explain how AI features process candidate data
Skip it if: Small companies that want self-serve sign-up, or buyers who need AI data use explained in advance. No prices are published. The pricing page asks visitors to complete a form.
- 8
Jobma ranks eighth. It states SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001, lists 70+ integrations, and describes an AI Interviewer with adaptive follow-ups and proctoring flags that a person reviews. Its policy names US servers in Iowa and keeps interview data at least one year. Price is quote-only and the policy leaves AI training unaddressed.
Strong on
- Pre-interview ID check, liveness test and in-interview flags are documented
- Candidates can interview in 16 languages, including coding tests in a live editor
- Privacy policy states US-Central1 hosting on Google Cloud
Weak on
- Interview data is kept for at least a year unless law requires otherwise
- Pricing is custom, and AI scoring is not explained in detail
Skip it if: Employers who must keep recordings in the EU, or who want a published price list. Custom packages based on volume, integrations and feature needs. No plan names or prices are published.
- 9
Talview comes ninth. Its pricing page describes unit-based billing with a likely minimum of 150 to 200 candidates, and its products include Ivy for interviews and Alvy for proctoring. Compliance is named only through logos and a trust page that lists GDPR and ISO 27001, with no hosting region and no AI training statement. Pilots are charged.
Strong on
- Ivy interviews, Alvy proctoring and identity verification are available as separate or bundled units
- Website says humans make the final decision to qualify or disqualify candidates
- Integrations include Workday, Moodle, Canvas and Microsoft Teams
Weak on
- Privacy policy says data may be processed in the USA, EU or EEA and India
- Pilots may incur charges above 10 candidates, and no free trial is listed
Skip it if: Small teams hiring a few people a year, or buyers who want a region-locked data store. Unit-based quote. A minimum of roughly 150 to 200 candidates is typical, according to the pricing page.
- 10
Tengai is tenth. It runs a roughly 20-minute avatar interview built on a Big-5 question set and says the AI never decides, and the page states no facial recognition. A Stockholm address is printed. Pricing, hosting, certifications and retention terms are missing, and the avatar speaks English and Swedish only. Treat it as a first-screen tool only.
Strong on
- Page states the AI is used only in the dialogue and the recruiter decides
- Candidates get personal feedback and keep access in the Talent Hub for a year
- Company address in Stockholm is printed on the home page
Weak on
- No price, hosting region or certification is stated on the pages we read
- The FAQ says interviews run in English and Swedish
Skip it if: Recruiters who need many interview languages, or a vendor with published security audits. No pricing or plans appear on the pages we read. Contact is by form or email.
- 11
HireVue ends the list because a buyer reading its pages learns the least about cost, hosting and certifications. It does document on-demand and live interviews, 1,000+ interview guides, an AI Interviewer and an AI Explainability Statement. Its privacy notice covers website visitors, and applicant data follows each customer's contract. A demo request starts every purchase, so no number can be checked.
Strong on
- Its Interview Builder offers 1,000+ job-specific interview guides for structured questions
- AI Explainability Statement and published ethical principles for its AI features
- Zoom, Teams and Webex calendar sync sits alongside applicant tracking links
Weak on
- No prices, hosting region or named certifications appear on the pages we read
- Applicant data rules sit in customer contracts, not in the public privacy notice
Skip it if: Buyers wanting a self-serve start, a trial or public prices. No price list. The product page offers a demo request and an ROI calculator.
How these AI video interviewing software were judged
How good are the AI scores in video interviewing software?
Score quality is the claim you cannot test from a vendor page. Hirevire scores each answer from 1 to 5 against weighted criteria you write and shows its reasoning, and Willo describes AI as support for human decisions. Tengai states that its avatar never decides and that the recruiter does. Interviewer.AI promises a transparent breakdown of each score. None of these pages offers an independent validation. Run a pilot on twenty past candidates whose outcomes you know, then compare the AI ranking with your hiring managers. If reviewers cannot see why a score was given, treat it as a note, not a verdict.
What does AI video interviewing software cost?
Printed prices exist but vary in shape. As of November 2026, Hirevire starts at $49 a month on Essentials with 300 interviews a year. Interviewer.AI lists $199 for 50 interview credits, and Hireflix starts at $75 a month billed yearly. Willo Lite is £49 per live role per month, and Cammio starts at €620 per month. Spark Hire begins at $299 monthly or $249 billed annually. VidCruiter, Jobma, Talview, Tengai and HireVue publish no price. Count interviews, not seats, because most plans cap one or the other.
Where are interview recordings stored and are they used to train AI?
Recordings of candidates are personal data, often biometric-adjacent, so storage and training terms matter. Hirevire's policy says responses are not used to train AI and video is deleted within 90 days by default. Spark Hire's policy allows AI use on anonymized and aggregated customer content, with OpenAI as a listed subprocessor. Cammio states a single AWS data center in Frankfurt, and VidCruiter lets you pick among five zones. Jobma stores data on US servers in Iowa. Interviewer.AI names OpenAI, Anthropic and Google as readers of transcript text only. For the others, the vendor's policy was not checked for this beyond what is noted.
How hard is it to switch video interviewing platforms?
The recordings are the asset, and retention clocks make them disappear. Hirevire deletes video after 90 days unless extended storage is bought at $9 a month, and Willo purges candidate data thirty days after a fixed-term contract ends. Spark Hire reserves interview downloads for annual plans, and its ATS plans are annual only. Hirevire allows cancellation within 60 days and deletes data 30 days later. Before signing, export a sample of recordings, scorecards and transcripts, confirm the format, and ask how long a candidate's data stays after a rejection, since GDPR deletion duties follow the employer.
Which video interviewing tool fits your hiring volume?
Hiring volume decides most of this. A company filling a handful of roles a year does well with Hireflix or Hirevire, whose entry plans run under $100 a month. Agencies that manage several clients look at Hirevire's Agency tier with five organizations. Employers screening thousands of applicants a year, such as retailers or call centers, lean toward Talview, VidCruiter, Jobma or HireVue, which sell through sales. European employers who want a Dutch or Swedish vendor can start with Cammio or Tengai. Pick the format first: recorded answers, adaptive chat or an avatar.
How to choose an AI video interviewing platform in three steps
- Decide which interview format you will actually run. List the formats you need before you open a pricing page: recorded answers, live panel calls, an adaptive AI conversation or an avatar. Hireflix and Cammio cover recorded answers and little else, Willo adds written and multiple-choice steps, and Jobma and Talview add proctoring. A format you do not use is a cost you still pay. Also decide whether a person must watch every video, because that choice sets how much the AI summaries save and whether a scored ranking is acceptable in your jurisdiction.
- Run a pilot on past candidates and compare outcomes. Ask two shortlisted vendors to process the same role with twenty candidates whose results you already know, and have hiring managers rank them blind. Interviewer.AI includes a 14-day trial with five assessments, and Hirevire gives seven days without a card, so a small test costs nothing. Note which scores your reviewers disagreed with and whether the reasoning was readable. A tool that ranks everyone near the middle gives you no filter, however tidy its dashboard looks. Keep the test small and written down.
- Get retention, subprocessors and candidate notice in writing. Ask each vendor for the default retention period, the subprocessor list, the hosting region and a statement on AI training in one document. Check who sends the candidate notice that an AI reads their answers, since the employer usually carries that duty. Hirevire and Willo publish retention periods, while others point to a general privacy notice. Compare the answer with your own retention schedule and note any gap before you sign, including who deletes recordings after an unsuccessful application. Keep the answers on file.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best AI video interviewing software in 2026?
Hirevire ranks first here because it prints three plans from $49 a month, includes AI scoring on every paid plan, offers a 7-day trial without a card and states that responses do not train AI. Interviewer.AI is the better pick for avatar interviews with credits, and Willo suits teams that want ISO 27001 and EU-first hosting.
Is AI video interviewing legal for hiring in the EU?
Using AI to screen candidates falls under high-risk rules in the EU AI Act, plus GDPR duties on notice and automated decisions. Several vendors say a person makes the final call, including Tengai, Jobma and Willo. Whether your use is lawful depends on your process, so ask counsel and the vendor for documentation before launch.
Which video interviewing tools have a free trial?
Hirevire offers 7 days with no credit card, Interviewer.AI offers 14 days with up to 5 AI interview assessments, and Hireflix offers one month free on its Small and Medium plans. Willo, Spark Hire, Cammio, VidCruiter, Jobma, Talview, Tengai and HireVue showed no trial on the pages we read.
Do candidates need to download an app to record an interview?
Usually not. Hireflix states that candidates need no app or login and can use any device with a camera. Willo says candidates complete assessments on any device on their own schedule, and Tengai says no download is needed. Check the candidate experience on a phone yourself, since a poor mobile flow lowers completion rates.
How much does one-way video interviewing cost per month?
Entry plans on the pages we read run from about $39 a month on Hirevire's yearly Essentials plan to $249 on Spark Hire's annual video plan and €620 at Cammio. Willo Lite charges £49 per live role. Enterprise vendors such as VidCruiter, Talview and HireVue publish no price, so budget for a quote.
Can AI interviewers replace a recruiter phone screen?
They can take over the first structured screen, and Tengai describes its avatar as replacing CV screening, phone interviews and the first selection round. They do not judge culture or negotiate. Vendors including Tengai and Jobma state that the recruiter decides, so keep a person in every shortlisting and rejection step.
Which video interviewing vendors state their hosting region?
Cammio states a single AWS data center in Frankfurt, and VidCruiter offers five zones: Canada, USA, Europe, UK and Australia. Interviewer.AI uses Singapore by default with Frankfurt for EU and UK employers, and Willo says data is primarily hosted in the EU. Jobma uses Iowa in the US. Others did not state a region.
What should I check before I cancel a video interviewing platform?
Export recordings, transcripts and scorecards first, because retention clocks can erase them. Hirevire deletes data thirty days after cancellation, and Willo purges candidate data thirty days after a fixed-term contract ends. Confirm the renewal date too: Spark Hire's ATS plans are annual only, and Willo Enterprise bills yearly.